rss
Inj Prev 2009;15:220-225 doi:10.1136/ip.2008.019976
  • Original Article

Identifying predictors of medically-attended injuries to young children: do child or parent behavioural attributes matter?

  1. B A Morrongiello1,
  2. M Corbett1,
  3. R J Brison2
  1. 1
    Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
  2. 2
    Emergency Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario
  1. Dr B A Morrongiello, Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada; bmorrong{at}uoguelph.ca
  • Accepted 3 February 2009

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether one can differentiate injured and uninjured young children based on child behavioural attributes or indices of caregiver supervision.

Method: A matched case–control design was used in which case participants were children presenting to an emergency department for treatment for an injury and age/sex matched control participants presented for illness-related reasons. During structured phone interviews about supervision parents reported on general supervisory practices (standardised questionnaire) and specific practices corresponding to time of injury (cases) or the last time their child engaged in the activity that incited their match’s injury (controls). Parents also reported on child behavioural attributes that have been linked to child risk taking in prior research (inhibitory control, sensation seeking).

Results: Results revealed no group differences in child behavioural attributes; however, the control group received more supervision both in general (OR = 4.82, 95% CI 1.89 to 12.33) and during the specified activity that led to injury in cases (OR = 5.38, 95% CI 2.13 to 13.58).

Conclusion: These findings confirm past speculation that caregiver supervision influences children’s risk of medically-attended injury and highlight the importance of targeting supervision in child-injury prevention interventions.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This research was supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Injury Prevention. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.