A needs assessment for regionalization of trauma care in a rural state

Am Surg. 2005 Aug;71(8):690-3.

Abstract

Systems of trauma care in urban areas have a demonstrated survival benefit. Little is known of the benefit of trauma system organization in rural areas. We hypothesized that examination of all trauma deaths during a 1-year period would provide opportunities to improve care in our rural state. We used a medical examiner database of trauma deaths occurring during a 1-year period. Five board-certified surgeons analyzed deaths as preventable (P), potentially preventable (PP), and non-preventable (NP) using modified Delphi technique. There were 223 trauma deaths during a 1-year period. Most (63%) died at the scene prior to any medical intervention. Adjudication of the deaths demonstrated 5 P (2%; 95% CI 1-5%), 36 PP (16%; 95% CI 12-27%), and 179 NP (81%; 95% CI 76-86%). Agreement among trauma surgeons was only moderate with a k of 0.46. Suicide accounted for a significant number of the overall trauma deaths at 32 per cent. Rural trauma system design should focus on discovery, as that is where the majority of deaths occur. Suicide is a significant problem in this rural state that should be aggressively targeted with prevention programs.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Hospitals, Rural / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Records
  • Middle Aged
  • Needs Assessment*
  • Regional Medical Programs / organization & administration*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rural Population*
  • Trauma Centers / organization & administration*
  • Vermont
  • Wounds and Injuries / mortality*
  • Wounds and Injuries / prevention & control
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy*