Parachute Ankle Brace and Extrinsic Injury Risk Factors During Parachuting
Knapik JJ, Darakjy S, Swedler D, Amoroso P, Jones BH. Parachute ankle brace and extrinsic injury risk factors during parachuting. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79:408–15.
Introduction: This study examined the injury prevention effectiveness of the parachute ankle brace (PAB) while controlling for known extrinsic risk factors. Methods: Injuries among airborne students who wore the PAB during parachute descents were compared with injuries among those who did not. Injury risk factors from administrative records included wind speed, combat loads, and time of day (day/night). Injuries were collected in the drop zone. Results: A total of 596 injuries occurred in 102,784 parachute descents. In univariate analysis, students not wearing the PAB (Controls) were 2.00 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.32–3.02] times more likely to experience an ankle sprain, 1.83 (95% CI = 1.04–3.24) times more likely to experience an ankle fracture, and 1.92 (95% CI = 1.38–2.67) times more likely to experience an ankle injury of any type. PAB wearers and Controls had a similar incidence of lower body injuries exclusive of the ankle [risk ratio (Control/PAB) = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.65–1.30]. After accounting for known extrinsic injury risk factors, Controls were 1.90 (95% CI = 1.24–2.90) times more likely than PAB wearers to experience an ankle sprain, 1.47 (95% CI = 0.82–2.63) times more likely to experience an ankle fracture, and 1.75 (95% CI = 1.25–2.48) times more likely to experience an ankle injury of any type. The incidence of parachute entanglements that persisted until the jumpers reached the ground were similar among PAB wearers and Controls [RR (Control/PAB) = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.61–2.29]. Conclusion: After controlling for known injury risk factors, the PAB protected against ankle injuries, and especially ankle sprains, while not influencing parachute entanglements or lower body injuries exclusive of the ankle.
Introduction: This study examined the injury prevention effectiveness of the parachute ankle brace (PAB) while controlling for known extrinsic risk factors. Methods: Injuries among airborne students who wore the PAB during parachute descents were compared with injuries among those who did not. Injury risk factors from administrative records included wind speed, combat loads, and time of day (day/night). Injuries were collected in the drop zone. Results: A total of 596 injuries occurred in 102,784 parachute descents. In univariate analysis, students not wearing the PAB (Controls) were 2.00 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.32–3.02] times more likely to experience an ankle sprain, 1.83 (95% CI = 1.04–3.24) times more likely to experience an ankle fracture, and 1.92 (95% CI = 1.38–2.67) times more likely to experience an ankle injury of any type. PAB wearers and Controls had a similar incidence of lower body injuries exclusive of the ankle [risk ratio (Control/PAB) = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.65–1.30]. After accounting for known extrinsic injury risk factors, Controls were 1.90 (95% CI = 1.24–2.90) times more likely than PAB wearers to experience an ankle sprain, 1.47 (95% CI = 0.82–2.63) times more likely to experience an ankle fracture, and 1.75 (95% CI = 1.25–2.48) times more likely to experience an ankle injury of any type. The incidence of parachute entanglements that persisted until the jumpers reached the ground were similar among PAB wearers and Controls [RR (Control/PAB) = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.61–2.29]. Conclusion: After controlling for known injury risk factors, the PAB protected against ankle injuries, and especially ankle sprains, while not influencing parachute entanglements or lower body injuries exclusive of the ankle.
Keywords: airborne; combat load; entanglements; epidemiology; military personnel; night; risk factors; wind
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 April 2008
- The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (ASEM) provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. ASEM is distributed to more than 80 nations.
To access volumes 86 to present, please click here. - Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Submit Articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content