Measuring and understanding road safety performance at local territorial level
Introduction
Historically, cities and regions have played an essential role in the formation of national-states and national societies. Their inhabitants gave the sense to the notion of national identity, cultural norms and habits. The sense of social identity, citizen responsibility and respect of authorities which are acquired through active community life have then a great impact on the way how people obey the law. Since behaviour and compliance with traffic rules are the key determinants for the occurrence of road crashes, it is straightforward to seek how to improve compliance with law at local level, at which many behaviour-shaping mechanisms operate.
The European integration has contributed to a certain relaxation of the ‘constraints of state’ and cities and regions have emerged as one possible level for regulation of interests, groups and institutions. Several European countries have recently seen their governance systems decentralized. Decentralized governance systems tend to have stronger accountability mechanisms and lower corruption (Nas et al., 1986, Rose-Ackerman, 1999), which are the factors presumably related to compliance with road traffic law. Lederman et al. (2005) argue that decentralization leads to a higher accountability, since easier monitoring means less severe informational problems at local level. In countries with decentralized administrative power, employment of the least amount of special legal powers of the state compatible with the task to be performed, are sought (Hood and Schuppert, 1988) to bring power as close to people as possible. Moreover, local governments are directly responsive to their citizens needs but may be subject to capture by elites (Bardhan and Mookherjee, 2006).
A common feature of policy making in all so called SUN countries (Sweden, United Kingdom and the Netherlands, three countries with the best road safety record in the world) is a vital participation of civil society organized in associations and interest groups (Koornstra et al., 2002) and the proximity of policy making to citizens. These have a huge implication contributing to a higher accountability and responsiveness. It is indeed a common feature of road safety improvement strategies in countries with best road safety records not to rely on traditional top-down governance, in which actions at local level are governed exclusively from the national level to which they are subordinated. Specific arrangements and responsibility distributions could be tracked in SUN countries. While in the UK, the key areas of application were infrastructure improvements and traffic law enforcement including contracts between local police forces and local authorities on the number of checks of specific offences, in the Netherlands, the accountability was enhanced through the local transport plans, being regularly put under scrutiny by the central government. In Sweden, the local initiatives by civil society, companies and authorities were likely contributing to the improvements leading to its exceptional road safety record.
Alongside with the natural interest in local territories as areas of policy actions in road safety, there are several other motifs to put local territorial level at the centre of attention of contemporary road safety research. First, it can be claimed that European and national authorities have already used a great part of the potential for interventions. The EU has already passed legislation on driver licensing, properties of vehicles, and safety of infrastructure. National authorities have brought extensive legislation regarding road user behaviour, including tools for enhancing compliance with law, such as penalty point system. Fields of actions targeting citizens at local level have, at the same time, been left unexploited until now.
Beside, territories have recently become the trial fields of numerous advances in road safety research, such as intelligent transport system applications (e.g. intelligent speed adaptation, alcohol interlocks, or the shared-space urban road design concept).
To allow assessment to be made on the impact of these innovative concepts on road safety, there is a need for evaluation tools and techniques, which are reliable and robust, but at the same time simple and understandable. This contradiction is most likely the reason why assessment of road safety level is so rarely done at local level. However, exceptions exist and several observation and evidence based studies could be identified in the literature. Their authors realized that at specific cases, it is indeed more feasible to somewhat restrain the geographical area for running statistical analysis. For example Servadei et al. (2003) assessed the effect of Italy’s motorcycle helmet law on brain injuries performed at Romagna region and Farchi et al. (2007) assessed the effectiveness of the new penalty point system in Italy in Lazio region. Similarly, there are studies showing the evidence of differences in road users’ behaviour at sub-national level. For example, there are significant intra-national differences in terms of the usage rate of restraint systems between Italian (Taggi et al., 2006) or Swiss regions (Siegrist et al., 2006). Similarly, the prevalence of driving while intoxicated varies between regions of France, Italy or Spain.
To summarize, there is a growing interest in local territorial level as the area of various policy actions. There is also a great potential for road safety improvements through local policy actions, which should not be ignored. The thorough understanding of mechanisms and the availability of tools for the statistical analysis are the main prerequisites for allowing road safety practitioners to evaluate the effects of various policy measures applied at local level and give appropriate feedback to policy makers on the effectiveness of their actions.
Section snippets
Framework for the analysis
There are numerous consideration issues when it comes to assessing road safety performance at local territorial level. They include among else the choice of spatial unit, time frame, indicators and relevant statistical method, but all of these are driven by the general framework for the analysis.
The assessment of road safety at local territorial level is of a particular interest where the main areas of policy actions are likely corresponding. The administrative areas of a country are to be
Analytical methods
Injuries from road crashes had originally been understood as a part of public health problem. But due to their relatively limited weight on health system at beginning of 20th century, they were often marginalized and eventually became forgotten part of public health research and initiatives (Porter, 1999). As a consequence, modern statistical techniques developed in epidemiology were rarely applied in road safety research. More particularly, the methods for statistical analysis in epidemiology
Discussion and conclusions
There are two basic reasons for comparing safety performance of sub-national jurisdictions. In the first place, a ranking of relative performance of each are very useful for comparison within countries. To ensure a meaningful benchmarking process, factors that could enable safety practitioners to achieve similar safety improvements need to be included within the ranking process. This might be done by developing a model of safety outcomes that includes these factors. The second reason is to
References (30)
- et al.
Comparison of road crashes incidence and severity between some French counties
Accident Anal. Prev.
(2003) Road mortality in Europe: how sensitive is it to demographic structure and population dynamics?
IATSS Res.
(2007)- et al.
Evolution of road risk disparities at small-scale level: example of Belgium
J. Safety Res.
(2008) - et al.
Identification of sites for road accident remedial work by Bayesian statistical methods: an example of uncertain inference
Adv. Eng. Soft.
(2001) - et al.
Geographic variations in mortality from motor vehicle crashes
New Engl. J. Med.
(1987) - et al.
Decentralisation and accountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries
Econ. J.
(2006) - Chapelon, J., 2002. Un nouvel indicateur d’accidentologie locale. In: Courier des statistiques, vol. 103. September...
- Eksler, V., 2009. Road mortality in Europe: a regional approach, PhD thesis, University of Versailles St-Quentin,...
Gender and age influence on fatality risk from the same physical impact determined using two-car crashes
Soc. Automot. Eng.
(2001)- et al.
Evaluation of the health effects of the new driving penalty point system in the Lazio Region, Italy, 2001–2004
Injury Prevent.
(2007)
Road Traffic Injuries in Lazio, Italy: a descriptive analysis from an emergency room-based surveillance system
Ann. Emerg. Med.
Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small area comparisons?
J. Public Health Med.
SUNflower: a Comparative Study of the Development of Road Safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands
Accountability and corruption: political institutions matters
Econo. Polit.
Cited by (21)
Improvement of road safety management systems of local governments in Korea after evaluating related indicators
2023, Accident Analysis and PreventionSpatial differentiation of road safety in Europe based on NUTS-2 regions
2021, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :Models, if any, are designed to depict groups of regions in a country or in neighbouring countries and analyse the trends in road safety changes. Neither do they address region-specific features (Eksler, 2010; Eksler et al., 2008; Eksler and Lassare, 2008; MacNab, 2004, 2003). The analysis of factors that may influence road safety in NUTS-2 regions was presented in the works by (Wachnicka, 2017, 2013; Wachnicka and Smolarek, 2012).
Risk exposure data-possibilities for assessing the risk exposure for the Republic of Serbia
2020, Transportation Research ProcediaRoad safety comparisons with international data on seriously injured
2018, Transport PolicyBest practice analysis of action for road safety in Iran amongst the leading developing countries using an optimized success indicator
2018, Transport PolicyCitation Excerpt :Undesirable effects of road crashes have been an issue of concern in recent years as undesirable output variables in DEA (e.g. Hermans et al., 2009; Ahmadvand et al., 2011; and Behnood et al., 2014). A better understanding of road safety performance at local territorial level was discussed by Eksler (2010) by application of Full Bayes spatiotemporal model on local road risk data. As a means to identify traffic safety best practice, Odeck (2006) used DEA to investigate target achievements of the operational units of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) charged with traffic safety services.
The close to home effect in road crashes
2017, Safety Science