Research articleGraduated Driver Licensing Decal Law: Effect on Young Probationary Drivers
Introduction
Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among U.S. adolescents, with men/boys accounting for over 70% of all deaths.1, 2 Graduated driver licensing (GDL) laws are a cornerstone of public policy aimed at reducing the burden of crashes on adolescent health. All U.S. states have GDL laws in place, designed to phase adolescents into licensure by delaying and/or extending the learning period and by introducing a “probationary” phase between the permit and the full-privilege (basic) driver license phases. During the probationary phase, young drivers are restricted from engaging in certain behaviors known to increase their crash and resultant fatality risk, including carrying passengers, driving at night, and using electronic devices.
Evaluations of GDL laws and specific GDL restrictions have consistently shown reductions in the prevalence of teen driver crashes.3, 4, 5, 6 However, the effectiveness of current laws has been limited by the inability of police officers to enforce them, given that identifying a probationary driver requires a traffic stop and visual inspection of the license.7, 8 Thus, the potential for GDL laws to have an even greater impact on reducing crashes in part hinges on efforts to enhance police enforcement of these restrictions.
To facilitate GDL enforcement efforts, several European and Asian countries, as well as jurisdictions in Australia and Canada, require novice teen drivers to display highly visible decals on their cars. The theory behind decal laws is that they enhance police enforcement, improve compliance with GDL restrictions, reduce risky driving among probationary drivers, and ultimately reduce the prevalence of young driver crashes.9 However, previously implemented decal laws have not been rigorously evaluated. New Jersey recently implemented the first-in-the-nation GDL decal law (Kyleigh's Law), requiring permitted and probationary drivers aged <21 years to display small decals on their license plates, regardless of when their license was issued (i.e., even if they initially obtained their license prior to implementation of the law). This implementation provides a unique opportunity to conduct an evaluation of this novel intervention.
The primary objective of this study was to examine the effect of New Jersey's decal law on the monthly rate of: (1) citations issued to probationary drivers for violation of a GDL restriction; and (2) police-reported crashes among New Jersey probationary teen drivers during the first year following the law's implementation. Secondary crash outcome measures included injury, nighttime, single-vehicle, multiple-vehicle, and peer-passenger crashes. Finally, a goal of the current study was to estimate the number of probationary drivers for whom a crash was prevented by the decal law.
Section snippets
Data Sources
The New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission's Licensing and Registration Database contains information on all New Jersey drivers' progression through the licensing process, as well as the type and date of driver “events” (e.g., moving violations, citations, crashes). Identifiable data were obtained for all individuals who had a license at some point from January 1, 2008 through May 31, 2011 (n=6,714,288 drivers). These data were linked to New Jersey Crash Record data over the same time period (n
Number of Probationary and Licensed Drivers
The number of probationary drivers aged 17 years remained stable at approximately 65,000 throughout the study period (Figure 1). The median number of new probationary licenses issued per month was also similar before and after the law became effective (pre-law: 8718/month; post-law: 8418/month), as was the median age of the driver (17.1 years for both) at the start of the probationary license period. The number of probationary drivers aged 18–20 years who were not yet eligible to obtain a basic
Discussion
By making probationary drivers easily identifiable to police, decal laws have been theorized to both enhance enforcement of GDL restrictions and increase the likelihood that drivers comply with GDL restrictions, thereby reducing their crash risk. Although decals have existed for more than a decade in other countries, there is very little previous evidence to support this theory.9 This study adds valuable initial evidence for the impact of a decal law on enforcement of GDL provisions by police,
References (16)
- et al.
Graduated driver licensing restrictions: Awareness, compliance, and enforcement in North Carolina
J Safety Res
(2004) Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS)
Traffic safety facts: young drivers. U.S, 2010 data
(2012)- et al.
Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina
JAMA
(2001) - et al.
Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: early impact on motor vehicle crashes among 16-year-old drivers
JAMA
(2001) - et al.
Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers
JAMA
(2011) - et al.
Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: A national study
Traffic Inj Prev
(2010) - et al.
Kentucky's graduated driver licensing program for young drivers: barriers to effective local implementation
Inj Prev
(2001)
Cited by (38)
Driver licensing, motor-vehicle crashes, and moving violations among older adults
2019, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :A crash in NJ is reportable if it results in an injury or over $500 worth of property damage. These two databases were linked via a hierarchical deterministic linkage; in total, 98% of crash-involved NJ drivers matched to a unique licensing record (Curry et al., 2013). The primary licensing outcome was the proportion of NJ’s older population (aged 65 and older) with a valid driver’s license; we used NJ’s middle-aged population (aged 35 to 54) as a comparison group.
Adolescents' perspectives on distracted driving legislation
2019, Journal of Safety ResearchYoung Driver Compliance With Graduated Driver Licensing Restrictions Before and After Implementation of a Decal Provision
2018, Journal of Adolescent HealthCitation Excerpt :Our previous evaluation of NJ's decal provision found that overall crash rates among young intermediate drivers decreased 9.5% in the 2 years after implementation [10,13]. Police enforcement—measured by per-driver rates of citations that were issued for violating GDL provisions—also increased but was primarily limited to the first year after the provision [10,13]. Although improved compliance with GDL provisions is one of the primary mechanisms by which decal provisions are hypothesized to lead to crash reduction (see Figure 1) [8], the findings of this study suggest that the association between NJ's decal provision and reduction in crashes was not mediated by an increase in intermediate drivers' compliance with nighttime and passenger restrictions.
Graduated driver licensing (GDL) in the United States in 2016: A literature review and commentary
2017, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :For example, in a 2014 survey, only 22% of teenagers who were subject to it approved of the policy (Williams & McCartt, 2014). However, evaluations have indicated that the decals law has had both short-term and longer-term crash reduction effects for intermediate license holders (Curry, Elliott, Pfeiffer, Kim, & Durbin, 2015; Curry, Pfeiffer, Localio, & Durbin, 2013), but no such effects for learners (Curry et al., 2015). A recent study indicated that compliance with night and passenger restrictions in New Jersey did not improve after the law went into force, but compliance was already high (98% for the nighttime restriction, 91% for the passenger restriction; personal communication, A.E. Curry).
Compliance With and Enforcement of Graduated Driver Licensing Restrictions
2017, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Melissa Pfeiffer was unaffiliated with an institution at the time this research was completed.