Elsevier

Accident Analysis & Prevention

Volume 75, February 2015, Pages 320-332
Accident Analysis & Prevention

Measures of activity-based pedestrian exposure to the risk of vehicle-pedestrian collisions: Space-time path vs. potential path tree methods

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Two probabilistic approaches to measure pedestrian exposure are developed.

  • Space-time path (STP) and potential path tree (PPT) methods are compared.

  • STP is a cost-effective deterministic approach.

  • PPT can better explain the collision pattern.

Abstract

Research on the extent to which pedestrians are exposed to road collision risk is important to the improvement of pedestrian safety. As precise geographical information is often difficult and costly to collect, this study proposes a potential path tree method derived from time geography concepts in measuring pedestrian exposure. With negative binomial regression (NBR) and geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) models, the proposed probabilistic two-anchor-point potential path tree (PPT) approach (including the equal and weighted PPT methods) are compared with the deterministic space-time path (STP) method. The results indicate that both STP and PPT methods are useful tools in measuring pedestrian exposure. While the STP method can save much time, the PPT methods outperform the STP method in explaining the underlying vehicle-pedestrian collision pattern. Further research efforts are needed to investigate the influence of walking speed and route choice.

Introduction

Pedestrians represent one of the most vulnerable groups of road users in motorized societies. In low-income countries, the share of pedestrian fatalities in total road deaths (around 35% on average in 2010) is often the highest among all road users (World Health Organization, 2013). In high-income countries, the percentage of pedestrian fatalities often remains high. According to the World Health Organization (2013), pedestrians accounted for about 27% of road traffic fatalities in the WHO European region. In Hong Kong, more than half of the road traffic deaths were pedestrians during the last decade (2001–2010) (Transport Department, 2014). The high share of pedestrians in traffic collisions is a serious public health problem that requires attention. Although there has not been a lack of research on vehicle-pedestrian collisions, most studies that took into account the characteristics of the road network focused on road intersections (Lee and Abdel-Aty, 2005, Kennedy, 2008, Miranda-Moreno et al., 2011, Pulugurtha and Sambhara, 2011). In reality, vehicle-pedestrian collisions do not just happen around road junctions. They can happen at mid-block locations or places where there are supposed to be few conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. Take our case study as an example (further discussed below), 73.2% of the vehicle-pedestrian collisions occurred at non-junction locations and 36.9% happened on road segments without any pedestrian crossing. Hence, for local network-based analysis, it is important to include all road segments in the transport network where potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts can occur.

The measurement of pedestrian exposures has always been an important research topic, but there is no consensus on the best pedestrian exposure measure. For local network-based analysis, recent efforts on pedestrian exposure measures focused on people’s activities in the context of time geography (Lam et al., 2013, Lam et al., 2014). Lam et al. (2014) developed space-time path (STP) and potential path tree (PPT) methods to measure pedestrian exposures. However, the probabilistic PPT method they proposed is applicable to short home-based trips only using one base or anchor point, that is, home, for the analysis. In other words, all trips are assumed to have the same pattern of “home-destination-home”. To bridge the research gap, this paper aims to further develop the PPT method which can be applied to trips of all types with different origins and destinations, that is, two anchor points. Moreover, two sub-categories of the two-anchor-point PPT method are developed by taking into consideration the route choice of pedestrians. The equal PPT (EPPT) method assumes that all walking paths are equally likely to be taken; and the weighted PPT (WPPT) method puts heavier weights on routes (namely the shortest paths) which are more likely to be chosen.

Then, these two PPT methods are compared with the STP method in estimating vehicle-pedestrian collision risks by using two collision prediction models, that is, the negative binomial regression (NBR) and geographically weighted poisson regression (GWPR). The objectives are twofold. Firstly, it aims to better understand the relative role of pedestrian exposure and other risk factors. Secondly, it aims to shed some light on the applications of general and spatial models in road safety analysis, particularly in areas where vehicle-pedestrian collisions are not just happening at road junctions but are more dispersed throughout the road network. However, the aim is neither to compare these two collision modelling techniques theoretically nor to prove/suggest that one of them is superior in all empirical situations.

In terms of scientific contributions, this paper breaks new ground by developing two network-based pedestrian exposure measures using the probabilistic two-anchor-point PPT methods. Moreover, the performances of different pedestrian exposure measures are compared using two collision prediction models both to better understand the relative role of pedestrian exposure and other risk factors, and to shed some light on the applications of general and spatial models in road safety analysis.

The following section will review the literature on pedestrian exposure measures, vehicle-pedestrian collision risk factors and collision prediction models. Section 3 will introduce the methodology. Compared with traditional methods, activity-based approaches have strengths at the local network level. Hence, a district in Hong Kong is chosen as the study area. Following data descriptions, the ways in which different pedestrian exposures are calculated by the STP and PPT (including both EPPT and WPPT) methods are presented. Then, the two statistical models of NBR and GWPR will be introduced briefly. The model results will be compared to better understand the vehicle-pedestrian collision risks, the explanatory power of different pedestrian exposure measures, and the usefulness of applying general and spatial models in road safety analysis. Finally, conclusions and further research directions will be presented.

Section snippets

Pedestrian exposure measures

In the literature, area-based and trip-based measures have been widely used to estimate pedestrian exposure (Greene-Roesel et al., 2007 Wundersitz and Hutchinson, 2008). Examples of area-based methods include the size of population and population density within predefined spatial units such as census blocks (Wier et al., 2009, Chakravarthy et al., 2010, Cottrill and Thakuriah, 2010). As these area-based exposure measures can easily lead to erroneous conclusions by obscuring the variability of

Data sources

This study relies on the link-node road system based on the updated road network data provided by the Lands Department of Hong Kong. Following the state-of-the-art network segmentation algorithm, the road network is segmented into 200-m intervals as basic spatial units (BSUs) (Loo and Yao, 2013). Vehicle-pedestrian collision data are derived from the traffic road accident database system (TRADS) collected by the Hong Kong Police Force. Vehicle-pedestrian collisions are first plotted onto a map

NBR

Table 4 presents the estimates of parameters for the four NBR models. Based on the key indicators of model fit such as log likelihood, AIC and BIC values, the NBR_EPPT Model was having the best model fit with the highest log likelihood, lowest AIC and BIC values. The NBR_WPPT5 Model and the NBR_WPPT7 Model rank the second and third places respectively. In Table 5, the MAD, MSPE, and NRMSE values also suggest that integrating PPT information into measures of pedestrian exposure can improve the

Conclusion

Although Global Positioning System (GPS) has been widely used for recording geographical coordinates, travel data that include precise locational information for a pedestrian at short time intervals (e.g. every 5 min) is difficult and costly to obtain. Dealing with imprecise and uncertain travel data, this research proposes a probabilistic method, including two probabilistic two-anchor-point PPT methods derived from time geography concepts in measuring pedestrian exposure. With the NBR and GWPR

References (58)

  • Lam et al.

    Pedestrian exposure measures: a time-space framework

    Travel Behav. Soc.

    (2014)
  • C. Lee et al.

    Comprehensive analysis of vehicle-pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2005)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression for county-level crash modeling in California

    Saf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • B.P.Y. Loo

    Validating crash locations for quantitative spatial analysis: a GIS-based approach

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2006)
  • B.P.Y. Loo et al.

    The identification of traffic crash hot zones under the link-attribute and event-based approaches in a network-constrained environment

    Comput. Environ.

    (2013)
  • D. Lord et al.

    The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives

    Transport. Res. Part A

    (2010)
  • L.F. Miranda-Moreno et al.

    The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian–vehicle collision occurrence at signalized intersections

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2011)
  • D.H. Mitchell et al.

    Topological network design of pedestrian networks

    Transport. Res. Part B

    (2001)
  • S.S. Pulugurtha et al.

    Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2011)
  • M. Raubal et al.

    Time geography for ad-hoc shared-ride trip planning in mobile geosensor networks

    Photogramm. Remote Sens.

    (2007)
  • S.L. Shaw

    What about time in transportation geography?

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2006)
  • M. Wier et al.

    An area-level model of vehicle-pedestrian injury collisions with implications for land use and transportation planning

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (2009)
  • D.A. Belsley et al.

    Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinerarity

    (2005)
  • C. Brunsdon et al.

    Geographically weighted regression

    J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Part D

    (1998)
  • Census and Statistics Department, 2008. 2006 Population By-census. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong....
  • B. Chakravarthy et al.

    The relationship of pedestrian injuries to socioeconomic characteristics in a large southern California County

    Traffic Inj. Prev.

    (2010)
  • A.D. Cliff et al.

    Spatial Processes: Models and Applications

    (1981)
  • W. Daamen et al.

    First-order pedestrian traffic flow theory

    Transport. Res. Rec.

    (2005)
  • S. Farber et al.

    A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion?

    Transport

    (2011)
  • Cited by (57)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text