Measures of activity-based pedestrian exposure to the risk of vehicle-pedestrian collisions: Space-time path vs. potential path tree methods
Introduction
Pedestrians represent one of the most vulnerable groups of road users in motorized societies. In low-income countries, the share of pedestrian fatalities in total road deaths (around 35% on average in 2010) is often the highest among all road users (World Health Organization, 2013). In high-income countries, the percentage of pedestrian fatalities often remains high. According to the World Health Organization (2013), pedestrians accounted for about 27% of road traffic fatalities in the WHO European region. In Hong Kong, more than half of the road traffic deaths were pedestrians during the last decade (2001–2010) (Transport Department, 2014). The high share of pedestrians in traffic collisions is a serious public health problem that requires attention. Although there has not been a lack of research on vehicle-pedestrian collisions, most studies that took into account the characteristics of the road network focused on road intersections (Lee and Abdel-Aty, 2005, Kennedy, 2008, Miranda-Moreno et al., 2011, Pulugurtha and Sambhara, 2011). In reality, vehicle-pedestrian collisions do not just happen around road junctions. They can happen at mid-block locations or places where there are supposed to be few conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. Take our case study as an example (further discussed below), 73.2% of the vehicle-pedestrian collisions occurred at non-junction locations and 36.9% happened on road segments without any pedestrian crossing. Hence, for local network-based analysis, it is important to include all road segments in the transport network where potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts can occur.
The measurement of pedestrian exposures has always been an important research topic, but there is no consensus on the best pedestrian exposure measure. For local network-based analysis, recent efforts on pedestrian exposure measures focused on people’s activities in the context of time geography (Lam et al., 2013, Lam et al., 2014). Lam et al. (2014) developed space-time path (STP) and potential path tree (PPT) methods to measure pedestrian exposures. However, the probabilistic PPT method they proposed is applicable to short home-based trips only using one base or anchor point, that is, home, for the analysis. In other words, all trips are assumed to have the same pattern of “home-destination-home”. To bridge the research gap, this paper aims to further develop the PPT method which can be applied to trips of all types with different origins and destinations, that is, two anchor points. Moreover, two sub-categories of the two-anchor-point PPT method are developed by taking into consideration the route choice of pedestrians. The equal PPT (EPPT) method assumes that all walking paths are equally likely to be taken; and the weighted PPT (WPPT) method puts heavier weights on routes (namely the shortest paths) which are more likely to be chosen.
Then, these two PPT methods are compared with the STP method in estimating vehicle-pedestrian collision risks by using two collision prediction models, that is, the negative binomial regression (NBR) and geographically weighted poisson regression (GWPR). The objectives are twofold. Firstly, it aims to better understand the relative role of pedestrian exposure and other risk factors. Secondly, it aims to shed some light on the applications of general and spatial models in road safety analysis, particularly in areas where vehicle-pedestrian collisions are not just happening at road junctions but are more dispersed throughout the road network. However, the aim is neither to compare these two collision modelling techniques theoretically nor to prove/suggest that one of them is superior in all empirical situations.
In terms of scientific contributions, this paper breaks new ground by developing two network-based pedestrian exposure measures using the probabilistic two-anchor-point PPT methods. Moreover, the performances of different pedestrian exposure measures are compared using two collision prediction models both to better understand the relative role of pedestrian exposure and other risk factors, and to shed some light on the applications of general and spatial models in road safety analysis.
The following section will review the literature on pedestrian exposure measures, vehicle-pedestrian collision risk factors and collision prediction models. Section 3 will introduce the methodology. Compared with traditional methods, activity-based approaches have strengths at the local network level. Hence, a district in Hong Kong is chosen as the study area. Following data descriptions, the ways in which different pedestrian exposures are calculated by the STP and PPT (including both EPPT and WPPT) methods are presented. Then, the two statistical models of NBR and GWPR will be introduced briefly. The model results will be compared to better understand the vehicle-pedestrian collision risks, the explanatory power of different pedestrian exposure measures, and the usefulness of applying general and spatial models in road safety analysis. Finally, conclusions and further research directions will be presented.
Section snippets
Pedestrian exposure measures
In the literature, area-based and trip-based measures have been widely used to estimate pedestrian exposure (Greene-Roesel et al., 2007 Wundersitz and Hutchinson, 2008). Examples of area-based methods include the size of population and population density within predefined spatial units such as census blocks (Wier et al., 2009, Chakravarthy et al., 2010, Cottrill and Thakuriah, 2010). As these area-based exposure measures can easily lead to erroneous conclusions by obscuring the variability of
Data sources
This study relies on the link-node road system based on the updated road network data provided by the Lands Department of Hong Kong. Following the state-of-the-art network segmentation algorithm, the road network is segmented into 200-m intervals as basic spatial units (BSUs) (Loo and Yao, 2013). Vehicle-pedestrian collision data are derived from the traffic road accident database system (TRADS) collected by the Hong Kong Police Force. Vehicle-pedestrian collisions are first plotted onto a map
NBR
Table 4 presents the estimates of parameters for the four NBR models. Based on the key indicators of model fit such as log likelihood, AIC and BIC values, the NBR_EPPT Model was having the best model fit with the highest log likelihood, lowest AIC and BIC values. The NBR_WPPT5 Model and the NBR_WPPT7 Model rank the second and third places respectively. In Table 5, the MAD, MSPE, and NRMSE values also suggest that integrating PPT information into measures of pedestrian exposure can improve the
Conclusion
Although Global Positioning System (GPS) has been widely used for recording geographical coordinates, travel data that include precise locational information for a pedestrian at short time intervals (e.g. every 5 min) is difficult and costly to obtain. Dealing with imprecise and uncertain travel data, this research proposes a probabilistic method, including two probabilistic two-anchor-point PPT methods derived from time geography concepts in measuring pedestrian exposure. With the NBR and GWPR
References (58)
- et al.
Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2000) - et al.
Comparison of road crashes incidence and severity between some French counties
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2003) Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey
Transport. Res. Part A
(1996)- et al.
Evaluating pedestrian crashes in areas with high low-income or minority populations
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2010) - et al.
Adjusting for luggage-laden pedestrians in airport terminals
Transport. Res. Part A
(1988) - et al.
Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City and Hong Kong
J. Transp. Geogr.
(2013) - et al.
Decomposing the impact of deprivation on child pedestrian casualties in England
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2008) - et al.
Development of planning level transportation safety tools using geographically weighted poisson regression
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2010) - et al.
Revisiting Hughes’ dynamic continuum model for pedestrian flow and the development of an efficient solution algorithm
Transport. Res. Part B
(2009) - et al.
Measuring the relative risk of pedestrian accidents
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(1983)
Pedestrian exposure measures: a time-space framework
Travel Behav. Soc.
Comprehensive analysis of vehicle-pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Using Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression for county-level crash modeling in California
Saf. Sci.
Validating crash locations for quantitative spatial analysis: a GIS-based approach
Accid. Anal. Prev.
The identification of traffic crash hot zones under the link-attribute and event-based approaches in a network-constrained environment
Comput. Environ.
The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives
Transport. Res. Part A
The link between built environment, pedestrian activity and pedestrian–vehicle collision occurrence at signalized intersections
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Topological network design of pedestrian networks
Transport. Res. Part B
Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Time geography for ad-hoc shared-ride trip planning in mobile geosensor networks
Photogramm. Remote Sens.
What about time in transportation geography?
J. Transp. Geogr.
An area-level model of vehicle-pedestrian injury collisions with implications for land use and transportation planning
Accid. Anal. Prev.
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinerarity
Geographically weighted regression
J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Part D
The relationship of pedestrian injuries to socioeconomic characteristics in a large southern California County
Traffic Inj. Prev.
Spatial Processes: Models and Applications
First-order pedestrian traffic flow theory
Transport. Res. Rec.
A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion?
Transport
Cited by (57)
Advances in estimating pedestrian measures through artificial intelligence: From data sources, computer vision, video analytics to the prediction of crash frequency
2024, Computers, Environment and Urban SystemsUsing computer vision and machine learning to identify bus safety risk factors
2023, Accident Analysis and PreventionSpatial analysis of collision risk of child pedestrians – A case of urban elementary school districts in Busan, Korea
2022, Travel Behaviour and SocietySafety of walking trips accessing to public transportation: A Bayesian spatial model in Hong Kong
2022, Travel Behaviour and SocietyA novel method of predictive collision risk area estimation for proactive pedestrian accident prevention system in urban surveillance infrastructure
2022, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging TechnologiesPedestrian safety at signalized intersections: Spatial and machine learning approaches
2022, Journal of Transport and Health