Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program☆
Introduction
Speeding is recognized as a major contributing factor in traffic crashes. In order to reduce speed-related crashes, the city of Scottsdale, Arizona implemented the first fixed photo speed enforcement camera demonstration program (SEP) in the US on a high-speed limited access facility. The 9-month demonstration program spanning from January 2006 through October 2006 was implemented on a 6.5 mile stretch of Arizona State Route 101, an urban freeway in Scottsdale. The SEP consisted of 6 speed detection stations in the enforcement zone, in which three cameras were positioned to enforce speed for each direction of travel (north and south bound). The speed limit on the SR 101 freeway is 65 mph, while the enforcement equipment is triggered to photograph drivers traveling at speeds of 76 mph or greater. This analysis is focused on estimating:
- •
The impact of the SEP on citable speeding behavior (i.e.. speeds ≥ 76 mph).
- •
The impact of the SEP on average speeds.
- •
The effect of the SEP on traffic safety.
- •
The expected economic safety benefit of the SEP.
Section snippets
Literature review
Numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate the relationship between speed and safety: detailed reviews of which are provided elsewhere (Lave and Lave, 1998, Stuster et al., 1998, Skszek, 2004, Kweon and Kockelman, 2005). In the 1960s, many studies found that the variance of speed is one of the most important factors affecting safety, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between crash rate and variance in speed. The relationship illustrates that the more the speed of driver deviates from
Impact on ticketed speeding behavior
Speed detection data in the enforcement zone are used to analyze the impact of the SEP on ticketed speeding behavior—vehicles exceeding 75 mph. Motorists driving between 66 and 75 mph are in violation of the posted speed limit but are not ticketed or detected by the SEP. The speed detection data were collected by the 6 enforcement cameras during the following warning, program, after, and reactivation periods:
- •
Warning period: 1/22/2006–2/21/2006 (31 days).
- •
Program period: 2/22/2006–10/23/2006 (244
Safety impacts
The assessments of safety impacts of the SEP are now presented. Preliminary analysis concepts are followed by a description of three analysis methods, their assumptions, and analysis results.
Conclusions and recommendations
The city of Scottsdale, Arizona demonstrated the first application of a fixed photo SEP in the US on a limited access urban interstate. This study analyzed the impact of the SEP on speeding behavior, traffic safety, and economic impacts of crashes. Three analysis approaches were used, including a before-after analysis with comparison site, a before-after analysis with correction for traffic flow, and an empirical Bayes’ analysis. All three methods produced similar results, with slight
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all agency partners in Arizona for providing data, as in particular the city of Scottsdale and the Arizona Department of Transportation for funding and supporting the evaluation. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway
References (46)
- et al.
Speed and safety effect of photo radar enforcement on a highway corridor in British Columbia
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2002) The importance of confounding in observational before-and-after studies of road safety measures
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2002)- et al.
The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents. An evaluation study on rural roads in the Dutch province Friesland
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2005) - et al.
Speed enforcement and speed choice
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(1982) Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash: a rule of thumb
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(1993)- et al.
The impact of red light cameras on safety in Arizona
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2007) Increased police enforcement: effects on speed
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(1997)- et al.
Would relaxing speed limits aggravate safety? A case study of Hong Kong
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2005) - Blincoe, L., Seay, A., Zaloshnja, E., Miller, T., Romano, E., Luchter, S., Spicer, R., 2002. Economic impact of motor...
- et al.
Time and distance halo effects of an overtly deployed mobile speed camera
The Handbook of Road Safety Measures
Safety impacts of differential speed limits for trucks and passenger cars on rural interstate highways: a modified empirical Bayes approach
J. Transport. Eng.
Econometric Analysis
The effects of automated speed enforcement systems on traffic flow characteristics and accidents in Korea
ITE J.
Observational Before-after Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety
Cited by (60)
Spot speed cameras in a series - Effects on speed and traffic safety
2024, Accident Analysis and PreventionEvaluation of point-to-point speed cameras to control speeding behavior in Thailand
2024, Journal of Safety ResearchEffects of automated speed control on speeding intention and behavior on mixed-traffic urban arterial roads
2022, IATSS ResearchCitation Excerpt :The conclusions and recommendations are presented in Section 5. Many previous studies have found that the placement of a sufficient amount of ASC cameras at appropriate locations cameras and the continuous enforcement can reduce speeding and crashes on limited access highways and freeways in developed cities [3–8]. Although the effectiveness of ASC in discouraging speeding behavior and improving road safety has been demonstrated, the mechanism of psychological change remains unknown.
The effectiveness of built environment interventions embedded in road safety policies in urban municipalities in Canada: An environmental scan and scoping review
2022, Journal of Transport and HealthCitation Excerpt :For example, road diet interventions (Chen et al., 2013; Kang, 2019) report mixed results while curb extensions were reported to reduce PMVCs. Installing speed cameras (Chen et al., 2002; De Pauw et al., 2014; Li et al., 2013; Mountain et al., 2004, 2005; Shin et al., 2009) a dedicated right of way for streetcars (Richmond et al., 2014a) and lowering posted speed limits (Chen et al., 2013; Grundy et al., 2009; Silvano and Bang, 2016a; Islam et al., 2014a) were reported to reduce MVCs and PMVCs by varying amounts. Non-pedestrian medians (Kang, 2019) and permitting on-street parking (Kang, 2019) were not effective.
“Slowed for several months”: A mixed methods comparison of minor, moderate, and extreme speeders
2021, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesAre multiple speed cameras more effective than a single one? Causal analysis of the safety impacts of multiple speed cameras
2020, Accident Analysis and Prevention
- ☆
This paper was presented at the Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting.
- 1
Tel.: +1 480 965 2220; fax: +1 480 965 0557.
- 2
Tel.: +1 541 737 8874; fax: +1 541 737 3052.