Brief reportRisk factors for injury in rural Iowa: Round one of the Keokuk County Rural Health Study
Introduction
U nintentional injuries represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in rural communities. From national mortality data, Baker et al.1, 2 have shown that a wide variety of fatal, unintentional injuries are more common in rural than in urban communities. In Iowa, unintentional injury rates were highest in counties with populations <10,000.3
Despite the high risk of unintentional injuries in rural communities, little attention has been paid to the distribution of injury risk factors in rural communities or to identifying the rural subgroups at highest risk for injury. Here we present the prevalence of risky behaviors among farmers, rural nonfarmers, and townspeople using data from the first round of the Keokuk County Rural Health Study, a population-based, longitudinal study of a rural Iowa county.
Section snippets
Data
Here we reported on the 1583 adults aged ≥25 years from Round One of the Keokuk County Rural Health Study, a longitudinal panel study of a rural community described elsewhere.4 This report focused primarily on the distribution of injury risk factors among members of farm households (those living on a farm), rural nonfarm households (those not living in town or on a farm), and town households (those living in incorporated towns). In presenting our data, we stratified by gender and age. Table 1
Seatbelts
A lower percentage of farmers (47.5%) reported always using seatbelts when driving than did rural nonfarmers (55.9%) or townspeople (57.1%). However, Table 2 demonstrates that seatbelt usage patterns differed by age and gender. Among women, there were no statistically significant differences in seatbelt usage among farm, rural nonfarm, and town women. Among men, the differences were clear. Men who lived in town and rural nonfarm men were more likely to report wearing their seatbelts than were
Discussion
Although others8 have commented on the high prevalence of behavioral risk factors for injury among rural populations, this study is the first to consider the distribution of these risky behaviors among different segments of the rural population. Using self-reported data from the Keokuk County Rural Health Study, we compared the prevalence of high-risk behavior among farmers, rural nonfarmers, and townspeople. For some risk factors, such as binge drinking, we found no significant differences
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a cooperative agreement from The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U07/CCU 706145-08) and a grant from The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (R49/CCR 703640-10). The authors thank the staff of the Keokuk County Rural Health Study who collected the data.
References (20)
- et al.
Occupation and the prevalence of major depression, alcohol, and drug abuse in the United States
Environ Res
(1993) - Baker SP, O’Neill B, Ginsburg MJ, Li G. The injury fact book, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press,...
- et al.
Geographic variations in mortality for motor vehicle crashes
N Engl J Med
(1987) - The University of Iowa and The Iowa Department of Public Health. The 1999 health fact book. Iowa City: The University...
- et al.
The Keokuk County Rural Health Studymethodology and demographics
J Agromed
(1997) - SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, vol. 1. 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.,...
- Zwerling C, Merchant JA, Reynolds SJ, Burmeister LF, Stromquist AM. Risk factors for injury in rural Iowa: preliminary...
- et al.
The CAGE questionnaire validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument
Am J Psychiatry
(1974) An injury control strategy for rural North Carolina
N C Med J
(1993)- Sayetta RB, Johnson DP. Basic data on depressive symptomatology: United States, 1974–75. Vital Health Stat 11...
Cited by (19)
Childhood agricultural injuries: An update for clinicians
2013, Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health CareCitation Excerpt :Clinicians who care for rural families should specifically target the most common risk-taking behaviors of this population. For example, rural parents and children are less likely to wear seat belts, more likely to own and use guns, and more likely to use recreational vehicles compared to their urban peers.101 In general, rural children are prone to obesity and dental caries, and rural teens are more likely to chew tobacco, use cigarettes, alcohol, and methamphetamine than their urban peers.102
Teenage driver crash incidence and factors influencing crash injury by rurality
2010, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :Rural roadways have higher crash incidence and crash injury rates than other types of roadways (Muellman & Mueller, 1996; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2001; Peek-Asa, Zwerling, & Stallones, 2004; Zwerling et al., 2005). This differential has been attributed to many factors including road design (Graham, 1993; Karlaftis & Golias, 2002), reduced use of safety devices (Baker, Clarke, & Brandt, 2000; Lundell, 2003; Zwerling et al., 2001), reduced enforcement of traffic safety laws, and prolonged access to acute medical care (Grossman et al., 1997; Maio, Green, Becker, Burney, & Compton, 1992; Peek-Asa et al., 2004; Rogers et al., 1997). Although several studies have examined overall trends for rural roadway crashes, few studies have identified populations that could be particularly vulnerable to the challenges of driving in the rural environment.
Firearm ownership and storage practices, U.S. households, 1992-2002: A systematic review
2004, American Journal of Preventive MedicineDepression and binge drinking in farm and non-farm rural adults in Saskatchewan, Canada
2020, Rural and Remote HealthRisk assessment of tractor-related hazards based on accident cases
2019, Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health