ViewpointA healthy reduction in oil consumption and carbon emissions
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
PATH wishes to acknowledge financial and intellectual support from the Department of Energy's Global Change Education Program (GCEP). Steve Allison, Dan Denning, Scott Crawford, and three anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments and suggestions.
References (22)
- et al.
The outlook for US oil dependence
Energy Policy
(1998) - et al.
Compendium of physical activitiesclassification of energy costs of human physical activities
- et al.
Body mass index and the prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia
Obesity Research
(2000) - EIA, 2000a. Petroleum Supply Annual 2000 DOE/EIA-0340, Washington, DC, United States Department of Energy, Office of...
- EIA, 2000b. Potential Oil Production from the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Updated Assessment...
- EIA, 2001. Annual Energy Review 2000 DOE/EIA–0384(00), Washington, DC, US Department of Energy, Office of Energy...
- EPA, 2002. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2000 EPA 430-R-02-003, Washington, DC, United...
A war on obesity, not the obese
Science
(2003)- et al.
Advanced technology paths to global climate stabilityenergy for a greenhouse planet
Science
(2002) - Institute of Medicine of the National Acadamies, 2002. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat,...
Cited by (23)
Contribution of bike-sharing to urban resource conservation: The case of free-floating bike-sharing
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :In this regard, numerous academic studies demonstrated in meaningful ways how bike-sharing has desirable environmental, economic and social benefits. For example, riding a bike instead of driving a car can reduce oil consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, traffic congestion and noise pollution, as well as bringing physical health benefits to users (Higgins and Higgins, 2005; Rojas-Rueda et al., 2013; Caulfield et al., 2017; Qiu and He, 2018; Shen et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2019; Cao and Shen, 2019). Past research assessed very specifically the environmental benefits of bike-sharing in terms of reduced oil consumption, and ensuing traffic, congestion, air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) (e.g., Shaheen et al., 2011; Zhang and Mi, 2018).
Contribution of shared bikes to carbon dioxide emission reduction and the economy in Beijing
2019, Sustainable Cities and SocietyCitation Excerpt :The analysis from Shaheen, Guzman, and Zhang (2010) demonstrated the advantages of shared bikes, such as convenient journey, reduction of traffic congestion in cities, CO2 emission reduction, flexible mobility, and physical health benefits. The possible amount of the reduction in oil consumption and CO2 emissions in the United States was calculated by Higgins and Higgins (2005); these authors concluded that the reduction of gasoline demand is equivalent to 34.9% of the current domestic oil consumption, thus assuming that driving cars is substituted by cycling. The concomitant reduction of CO2 emissions will be approximately 10.9%, relative to emissions in1990.
Degrowth, energy descent, and ‘low-tech’ living: Potential pathways for increased resilience in times of crisis
2018, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Obviously, some short trips may not be easily replaced with cycling or walking (e.g. moving a tonne of bricks a few blocks down the road), but at the same time, some trips longer than 5 km could be easily cycled. Indeed, a study in the US (Higgins and Higgins, 2005), based on recommended daily exercise, has shown that by substituting walking and cycling for short car trips could reduce US domestic oil consumption by up to 34.9% while also having huge health benefits. This suggests the potential of low-tech travel is considerable.
Reduction of CO<inf>2</inf> emission and non-environmental co-benefits of bicycle infrastructure provision: The case of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia
2015, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Therefore, studies on health co-benefits were placed in context on areas with high rate of private vehicle use (such as UK, US, and Australia,). In line with this fact, literature on cycling co-benefits is predominantly related to the developed countries context [40,41,43–46]. Additionally, there have been identified few recent studies that cover institutional issues related to implementation of co-benefits approach, and both of them are related to Indian context, as the world׳s second most populous country [13,66].
Obesity and climate change mitigation in Australia: Overview and analysis of policies with co-benefits
2014, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health