Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 355, Issue 9200, 22 January 2000, Pages 265-269
The Lancet

Articles
Fluoride in drinking water and risk of hip fracture in the UK: a case-control study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)07161-5Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Although the benefits of water fluoridation for dental health are widely accepted, concerns remain about possible adverse effects, particularly effects on bone. Several investigators have suggested increased rates of hip fracture in places with high concentrations of fluoride in drinking water, but this finding has not been consistent, possibly because of unrecognised confounding effects.

Methods

We did a case-control study of men and women aged 50 years and older from the English county of Cleveland, and compared patients with hip fracture with community controls. Current addresses were ascertained for all participants; for those who agreed to an interview and who passed a mental test, more detailed information was obtained about lifetime residential history and exposure to other known and suspected risk factors for hip fracture. Exposures to fluoride in water were estimated from the residential histories and from information provided by water suppliers. Analysis was by logistic regression.

Findings

914 cases and 1196 controls were identified, of whom 514 and 527, respectively, were interviewed. Among those interviewed, hip fracture was strongly associated with low body-mass index (p for trend < 0·001) and physical inactivity (p for trend < 0·001). Estimated average lifetime exposure to fluoride in drinking water ranged from 0·15 to 1·79 ppm. Current residence in Hartlepool was a good indicator for high lifetime exposure to fluoride. After adjustment for potential confounders, the odds ratio associated with an average lifetime exposure to fluoride ≥0·9 ppm was 1·0 [95% Cl 0·7–1·5].

Interpretation

There is a low risk of hip fracture for people ingesting fluoride in drinking water at concentrations of about 1 ppm. This low risk should not be a reason for withholding fluoridation of water supplies.

Introduction

Fluoride has been added to drinking-water supplies in some areas of the UK since 1955 in an attempt to reduce the frequency of dental caries.1 Although this benefit of fluoridation of water supplies is widely accepted, concerns remain about possible adverse health effects, particularly on bone.2 About 50% of ingested fluoride is taken up by bone, and fluoridation of water can increase normal dietary intake by about 50%.3 Fluoride affects bone in at least two ways-fluoride ions can replace hydroxyl ions in the hydroxyapatite lattice, and increased fluoride concentrations in plasma directly increase osteoblastic differentiation and activity. Such changes could have an important effect on risk of fracture.

Trials have shown that high doses of sodium fluoride substantially increase bone density at axial sites, but this effect was not associated with lower rates of spinal fractures.4, 5 However, at peripheral sites, bone density was decreased, which suggests that fluoride might increase the risk of some fractures. This effect has only been seen when intake has been substantially higher than would be expected from fluoridation of water, however, and the implications of lower exposure for risk of fracture are not certain.

Most epidemiological evidence comes from ecological studies of hip fracture,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 but the results of such investigations have not been consistent. Some studies have suggested a positive association between the concentration of fluoride in water and incidence of fractures,11, 12, 13, 14, 16 but others have found no association7, 8, 10, 15 or even an inverse relation.6, 9 Only two studies have related the risk of hip fracture to fluoride ingestion in individuals rather than populations,17, 18 and for one of these only a brief preliminary analysis has been published.18

The limited scope in ecological studies to adjust for the effects of potential confounding variables (such as physical activity, body build, cigarette smoking, dietary calcium intake, and reproductive variables) makes interpretation of their conflicting findings difficult. To address this uncertainty, we did a population-based case-control study in which the exposure of patients with a hip fracture to fluoride in drinking water was compared with that of controls after adjustment for possible confounding by other risk factors. We did this investigation in the county of Cleveland in northeast England. The Hartlepool area of Cleveland had always been supplied with water naturally high in fluoride (> 1 ppm), whereas the rest of the county received water with a low fluoride concentration.

Section snippets

Methods

The study population consisted of residents of Cleveland aged 50 years and older. Virtually all cases of hip fracture in the county are treated at three hospitals—Hartlepool General Hospital, North Tees General Hospital (Stockton), and Middlesbrough General Hospital. By regularly searching ward admission books, we identified all members of the study population who were admitted to these hospitals during a 17-month period with newly diagnosed fractures of the femoral neck that were through or

Results

914 cases were identified during the study period, of whom 514 (56%) had an interview. There were 1196 controls, of whom 527 (44%) were interviewed (table 1). The main reason for cases not completing interviews was a low score on the mental test (295 patients)-such low scores were more common at older ages. The main reasons for the incomplete response from controls were because general practitioners advised that they should not be approached (108); they could not be contacted at the address

Discussion

We found no evidence of any increase in the risk of hip fracture from fluoride in drinking water at concentrations of about 1 ppm. The association was examined in two ways. First, in the subset of people who underwent interview, we looked at risk of fracture in relation to estimates of exposure to fluoride in water during different periods of life. This analysis had the advantage that it allowed for possible confounding by various known and suspected causes of fracture. Furthermore, since

References (27)

  • I Arnala et al.

    Hip fracture incidence not affected by fluoridation: osteofluorosis studied in Finland

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1986)
  • SJ Jacobsen et al.

    Regional variation in the incidence of hip fracture

    JAMA

    (1990)
  • C Cooper et al.

    Water fluoride content and fracture of the proximal femur

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1990)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Overview of fluoride removal from water using separation techniques

      2021, Environmental Technology and Innovation
    • MRCI study on potential energy curves and spectroscopic properties of HF molecule

      2014, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hydrogen fluoride (HF) is an important industrial chemical used for fabricating aluminum [1]. In the other hand, HF is also used in the fluoridation of drinking water [2–4]. The geometry and structures of HF molecule attracted much more research interests in past four decades.

    • Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous media using citrus limonum (lemon) leaf

      2014, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the benefits of water fluoridation for dental health are widely accepted, concerns remain about possible adverse effects, particularly effects on bone. Increased rates of hip fracture in places with high concentrations of fluoride in drinking water have also been suggested by several investigators but this finding has not been consistent [6]. There is a low risk of hip fracture for people ingesting fluoride in drinking water at concentrations of about 1 mg/L [6].

    • Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The Impact of Fluoride on Health

      2012, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the amount of fluoride in the water supply considered optimal to promote oral health (1 ppm or 1 mg/L), is not considered sufficient to stimulate osteoblast activity or prevent osteoporotic fractures.7 Studies suggest concentrations of sodium fluoride in the water supply would need to reach a threshold of 4 ppm to promote osteoblast activity.8 Meta-analysis of the efficacy of fluoride therapy (at fluoride levels much higher than from water fluoridation) on bone loss and fractures9 and other comprehensive reviews10,11 have determined that although fluoride has an ability to increase bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, it does not cause a reduction in vertebral fractures12 and can increase side effects.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text