Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 379, Issue 9826, 28 April–4 May 2012, Pages 1621-1629
The Lancet

Articles
Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61851-5Get rights and content

Summary

Background

About 15% of adults worldwide have a disability. These individuals are frequently reported to be at increased risk of violence, yet quantitative syntheses of studies of this issue are scarce. We aimed to quantify violence against adults with disabilities.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 12 electronic databases to identify primary research studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and Aug 17, 2010, reporting prevalence estimates of violence against adults (aged mainly ≥18 years) with disabilities, or their risk of violence compared with non-disabled adults. We included only studies reporting violence occurring within the 12 months before the study. We assessed studies with six core quality criteria, and pooled data for analysis.

Findings

Of 10 663 references initially identified, 26 were eligible for inclusion, with data for 21 557 individuals with disabilities. 21 studies provided data suitable for meta-analysis of prevalence of violence, and ten for meta-analysis of risks of violence. Pooled prevalence of any (physical, sexual, or intimate partner) recent violence was 24·3% (95% CI 18·3–31·0) in people with mental illnesses, 6·1% (2·5–11·1) in those with intellectual impairments, and 3·2% (2·5–4·1) in those with non-specific impairments. We identified substantial heterogeneity in most prevalence estimates (I2 >75%). We noted large uncertainty around pooled risk estimates. Pooled crude odds ratios for the risk of violence in disabled compared with non-disabled individuals were 1·50 (95% CI 1·09–2·05) for all studies combined, 1·31 (0·93–1·84) for people with non-specific impairments, 1·60 (1·05–2·45) for people with intellectual impairments, and 3·86 (0·91–16·43) for those with mental illnesses.

Interpretation

Adults with disabilities are at a higher risk of violence than are non-disabled adults, and those with mental illnesses could be particularly vulnerable. However, available studies have methodological weaknesses and gaps exist in the types of disability and violence they address. Robust studies are absent for most regions of the world, particularly low-income and middle-income countries.

Funding

WHO Department of Violence and Injury Prevention and Disability.

Introduction

Roughly 15% of adults worldwide have a disability.1 This prevalence is predicted to increase because of ageing populations, the increased risk of disability in elderly people, and the worldwide rise in chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mental illnesses.2, 3 Approaches to disability increasingly emphasise environmental and social factors, with recognition that “disability results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”.4 Protection of the rights of individuals with disabilities, and enablement of their full participation in society has become a major global priority, underpinned by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.4 To support action on this priority, the World Report on Disability1 gathered evidence about the magnitude of disability worldwide, its effect on well-being, and how the barriers faced by individuals with disability can be overcome.

About half a million adults die every year because of interpersonal violence;3 millions more suffer non-fatal violence and the resulting health and socio-occupational consequences. People with disabilities seem to be at an increased risk of interpersonal violence1 because of several factors: exclusion from education and employment, the need for personal assistance with daily living, reduced physical and emotional defences, communication barriers that hamper the reporting of violence, societal stigma, and discrimination.5, 6 Furthermore, rising numbers of media reports emphasise cases of physical violence, sexual abuse, and hate crime inflicted on individuals with disabilities in homes, institutions, communities, and other settings.7, 8, 9, 10 However, whether this increase indicates a rising prevalence of violence against individuals with disabilities, more consistent reporting to authorities, or greater media coverage than previously is unclear.

Although an increasing amount of research has been done to quantify violence against individuals with disabilities, study methods and the definitions of disability and violence vary widely, and no quantitative syntheses of this evidence have been done. Understanding of the magnitude of violence against affected groups is the first step in the public health approach to violence prevention.11 This step is a basic prerequisite to understand risk and protective factors, develop and rigorously assess interventions, and implement effective programmes to prevent violence. Thus, to support the World Report on Disability, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of violence against adults with disability. We aimed to identify the characteristics and coverage of research for the prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities; assess the quality of this research; and synthesise evidence on the prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities.

Section snippets

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, ASSIA, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, Cochrane Library, Embase, National Criminal Justice Reference System Abstracts Database, Social Care Online, and Social Sciences Citation Index to identify primary research studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and Aug 17, 2010, that reported prevalence estimates of violence against adults (mainly aged ≥18 years) with disabilities, or the risk of violence in disabled

Results

Of 10 663 abstracts, we identified 26 studies13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 that were eligible for inclusion (figure 1, appendix). 22 studies used a cross-sectional design, but four20, 31, 34, 37 were cohort studies. 14 studies provided data for the prevalence of violence in a sample of individuals with disabilities only, whereas the remaining 12 measured violence in individuals with and without disabilities. Across 24

Discussion

Findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis show that violence is a major problem in adults with disabilities, who are at an increased risk of violence compared with non-disabled adults. Prevalence estimates of any (physical, sexual, or intimate partner) recent violence were highest in individuals with mental illnesses and lowest in those with non-specific impairments. The small number of studies and wide variation in sample and study characteristics mean a great deal of uncertainty

References (47)

  • Dementia relatives admit abuse

  • P Curtis et al.

    Panorama care home abuse investigation prompts government review

  • Police ‘fail’ disabled people suffering hate crime

  • EG Krug et al.

    World report on violence and health

    (2002)
  • Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare

    (2008)
  • DA Brownridge

    Violence against women with disabilities: perpetrator characteristics are key

  • C Casteel et al.

    National study of physical and sexual assault among women with disabilities

    Inj Prev

    (2008)
  • P Hall et al.

    Violent and sexual crime

  • SL Martin et al.

    Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities

    Violence Against Women

    (2006)
  • RE Matthias et al.

    Abuse and neglect of clients in agency-based and consumer-directed home care

    Health Soc Work

    (2003)
  • MR Rand et al.

    Crime against people with disabilities, 2007

  • E Slayter

    Intimate partner violence against women with disabilities: implications for disability service system case management practice

    J Aggression Maltreat Trauma

    (2009)
  • JB Carlile

    Spouse assault on mentally disordered wives

    Can J Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • Cited by (400)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text