Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts
Introduction
The numbers of people killed and injured in traffic accidents in Japan in 1996 are broken down into percentages in Fig. 1 according to the direction of impact (Japan Traffic Safety Association, 1997). These data indicate the characteristics of vehicle occupant fatalities and injuries in traffic accidents in Japan. The largest number of fatalities occurred in frontal impacts, followed by side impacts, with very few fatalities occurring in rear impacts. In contrast, the largest number of injuries occurred in rear impacts, which accounted for nearly one-half of the total. This tendency was completely different from the results seen for fatalities. An investigation of the nature of the injuries suffered in rear impacts revealed that approximately 90% were neck injuries, which accounted for approximately 44% of all injuries (Fig. 2). It will be noted that these same tendencies were also observed in 1997 traffic injury data (Fig. 3).
According to a report based on traffic accident data compiled in Germany, over 90% of such neck injuries in rear impacts occur at ΔV (change of velocity of struck car) ≤25 km/h (Eichberger et al., 1996). This indicates that neck injuries are a characteristic of low-speed rear impacts.
Whiplash neck injuries that occur in low-speed rear impacts are thought to be related to automotive seat characteristics (Olsson et al., 1990, Ono et al., 1993, Song et al., 1996). For this reason, it is very important to know how seat characteristics affect occupant motions in low-speed rear impacts. Since vehicle occupants are mainly restrained by the seatback and the head restraint in low-speed rear impacts, the position of the head restraint and the stiffness distribution of the seatback are selected as parameters expressing seat characteristics in this research.
Section snippets
Injury mechanism
It has generally been accepted that hyperextension of the neck is the cause of whiplash, and research has been conducted to examine the tolerance of humans to hyperextension of the neck (Mertz et al., 1971). The results of recent studies have shown, however, that factors other than hyperextension also deserve attention (Matsushita et al., 1994). It has been reported that whiplash can occur even in situations that do not lead to hyperextension (Svensson et al., 1993, Bostrom et al., 1996, Ono et
Materials
Table 1 gives the specifications of the six seats used in the sled tests.
Seat A was a standard seat. Standard seat means a front seat designed for a small passenger car.
Seat B was created by adding a mechanical linkage system to seat A. As illustrated in Fig. 5, the linkage system used the occupant’s inertial force at the time of impact to move the head restraint forward and upward. In other words, the head restraint of seat B was ordinarily in the same position as that of the other seats, and
Test method
Using the sled test setup shown schematically in Fig. 8, sled impact tests were conducted that simulated low-speed rear impacts. These tests were conducted under conditions equivalent to the change of velocity ΔV=25 km/h, because it has been reported that over 90% of all neck injuries in rear impacts occur at the change of velocity ΔV≤25 km/h (Eichberger et al., 1996). Specifically, the sled impact velocity was V0=20 km/h and the post-impact reaction velocity was approximately 5 km/h.
The impact
Test method
Using the sled test setup shown schematically in Fig. 12, tests that simulated low-speed rear impacts were conducted with a volunteer. To ensure the safety of the volunteer, the sled impact velocity was set at V0=8 km/h based on previous test data (Ono et al., 1997). Measurements were made of the volunteer resultant acceleration and visible motions captured by a high-speed video camera about all seats. About seats A and B, cervical vertebral motions were also recorded by X-ray cineradiography
Conclusions
This study examined the visible motions of a vehicle occupant thought to be closely related to the mechanism of whiplash. The influences of seat parameters on dummy responses in low-speed rear impacts were analyzed with respect to these visible motions. An analysis was also made of data recorded in sled impact tests conducted with a human volunteer. The results made clear the following points under the limited test conditions used in this study.
(1) The position of the head restraint influenced
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) for letting us use the traffic accident data.
References (12)
- Bostrom, O., Svensson, M.Y., Aldman, B., Hansson, H.A., Haland, Y., Lovsund, P., Seeman, T., Suneson, A., Saljo, A.,...
- Eichberger, A., Geigl, B.C., Moser, A., Fachbach, B., Steffan, H., 1996. Comparison of Different Car Seats Regarding...
- Japan Traffic Safety Association, Traffic Greenpaper, November 1997, pp....
- Matsushita, T., Sato. T.B., Hirabayashi, K. 1994. X-Ray Study of the Human Neck Motion Due to Head Inertia Loading, SAE...
- Mertz, H.J., Patrick, L.M. 1971. Strength and Response of the Human Neck, SAE...
- Olsson, I., Bunketorp, O., Carlsson, G., Gustafsson, C., Planath, I., Norin, H., Ysander, L., 1990. An in-Depth Study...
Cited by (56)
A recent investigation on design aspects of vehicle crash analysis in India
2020, Materials Today: ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :The enhanced safety features for frontal seat occupants are more significant due to the age constraint than the rear-seat passengers. It is difficult to improve the safety restrain system in the rear seat because we cannot determine the passengers' size and age [23] fastened in the vehicle's back-end. Watanabe et al. surveyed that rear-end collisions cause 43.5% injuries in total, and amongst this, 90% injuries affect the neck and spinal cord [24].
Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration
2018, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :Injuries to the cervical spine are the most common impairing injuries for vehicle occupants on both the Permanent Medical Impairment (PMI) 1+ and PMI 10+ level (Stigson et al., 2015). Whiplash injuries occur at relatively low velocity changes (typically <25 km/h) (Eichberger et al., 1996; Kullgren et al., 2003), and in impacts from all directions, although rear impacts are most frequently featured in accident statistics (Watanabe et al., 2000). Injury statistics from the mid-1960s until today show that females have a higher risk of sustaining whiplash injuries than males, ranging from 1.5 to 3 times higher (among others Kihlberg 1969; O’Neill et al., 1972; Otremski et al., 1989; Morris and Thomas, 1996; Dolinis 1997; Temming and Zobel, 1998; Richter et al., 2000; Chapline et al., 2000; Kullgren et al., 2003; Jakobsson et al., 2004; Storvik et al., 2008).
Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles
2017, Traffic Injury PreventionA female head–neck model for rear impact simulations
2017, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Gender has been shown to be an important factor for the risk of sustaining Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD); the risk for females sustaining symptoms is on average double that of males and in similar crash conditions even higher (Carstensen et al., 2012; Jakobsson et al., 2004; Krafft et al., 2003; Morris and Thomas, 1996; O’Neill et al., 1972; Temming and Zobel, 1998). WAD can occur in all impact directions, with rear impacts occurring most frequently in accident statistics (Stigson et al., 2015; Watanabe et al., 2000). WADs originate from damage to the soft tissue structures of the neck and a significant part of long term disability resulting from vehicle crashes is caused by WAD, up to 70% in Sweden (Kullgren et al., 2007).
ADSEAT - Adaptive seat to reduce neck injuries for female and male occupants
2013, Accident Analysis and PreventionKinematic analysis of an unrestrained passenger in an autonomous vehicle during emergency braking
2024, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology