Logging fatalities in the united states by region, cause of death, and other factors — 1980 through 1988

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(94)90021-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Logging has been reported to be one of the most hazardous industries in the United States for fatal injury. However, most studies have been at the state level and did not look at the logging industry specifically, but identified the risk of this industry through comparisons of fatalities across all industries. National data on logging injuries have concentrated on nonfatal injuries, not fatal injuries. To learn more about fatal logging injuries, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health analyzed the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality surveillance system for demographic differences in logging fatalities occurring in the United States from 1980 through 1988. The results indicate that there are regional differences in logging fatality rates, with the highest fatality rates occurring in those regions of the country harvesting primarily hardwood sawtimber. No significant differences in fatality rates between African-American and white workers were found.

References (35)

  • American National Standards Institute [ANSI]

    Safety requirements for pulpwood logging

    (1971)
  • C.A. Bell

    Female homicides in United States workplaces, 1980–1985

    American Journal of Public Health

    (1991)
  • C.A. Bell et al.

    Fatal occupational injuries in the United States, 1980 through 1985

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1990)
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

    Mortality experience of Pennsylvania workers, 1983–1985

    (1987)
  • W.J. Conover

    Practical nonparametric statistics

    (1980)
  • Executive Office of the President

    Standard industrial classification manual, 1987

    (1987)
  • D.E. Fosbroke et al.

    Interpreting logging injury statistics

  • T.M. Frazier et al.

    NIOSH surveillance report: Job injuries among loggers

  • J. Gaskin

    Analysis of fatal logging accidents — 1968 to 1987

    Logging Industry Research Association Report

    (1989)
  • E.L. Jenkins et al.

    Fatal injuries to workers in the United States, 1980–1989: A decade of surveillance — National profile

  • J.M. Last

    A dictionary of epidemiology

    (1988)
  • J.P. Leigh

    Odds ratios of work related deaths in United States workers

    British Journal of Industrial Medicine

    (1988)
  • L. Mace

    Leading causes of death by industry group: South Carolina, 1983–1985

    (1986)
  • S. Milham

    Occupational mortality in Washington State, 1950–1979

  • C.R. McCormack

    Injuries and accident causes in logging operations, 1955

  • J.R. Myers

    The National Traumatic Occupational Fatalities: A surveillance tool for agricultural work-related deaths [SUMMARY]

  • Cited by (51)

    • Analysis of occupational accidents during the chainsaws use in Andalucía

      2021, Safety Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, most of the research is focused on injuries or accidents in the forestry sector in general or in some of the phases mentioned, but it does not focus directly on the chainsaw. Thus, several investigations have been carried out in different countries such as United States focused on logging injures and fatal accidents (Myers and Fosbroke, 1994) or in characterization of logging injures (Lefort et al., 2003). Also in this country, Wilmsen et al. (2015) carried out a study of occupational injuries and illnesses, medical treatment and general working conditions for forestry workers.

    • Risk factor analysis of fatal forest harvesting accidents: A case study in Turkey

      2015, Safety Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is an urgent need for a well-trained, certified forest workforce which can successfully cope with the requirements of a modern, sustainable multi-functional forestry industry (Tsioras, 2010). The identification of training priorities might be conducted at a national (Bentley et al., 2002), regional (Myers and Fosbroke, 1994) or state (West et al., 1996) level; however, the most effective approach is probably the local, case-by-case study (Bordas et al., 2001; Montorselli et al., 2010). Unlike traditional safety training, a short module on the forestry job layout and work practices which combines both prevention and work efficiency can help loggers better plan tasks and become more knowledgeable about the safest, most productive ways to accomplish their work (Chapman and Husberg, 2008).

    • The epidemiology of fatal occupational traumatic brain injury in the U.S.

      2011, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is a limited amount of research on logging injuries; the focus generally has been to document the injury problem and describe the most common injury scenarios.29–32 This analysis confirmed that despite earlier documentation of the highly hazardous nature of logging activities, there has been a lack of substantial progress toward declining rates.33,34 In Wrona's analysis of work-related traumatic brain injuries, it was suggested that it would be worthwhile to review prevention efforts in logging and other industries where relative risks are more than 25 and have not changed since 1990.7

    • Relating safety, productivity and company type for motor-manual logging operations in the Italian Alps

      2010, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      To avoid this, one should design dedicated courses targeting specific safety-related behaviors (Komaki et al., 1978), after these have been properly identified (Killimett, 1991). The identification of training priorities may be conducted at a national (Bentley et al., 2002), regional (Myers and Fosbroke, 1994) or state (West et al., 1996) level, but probably the most effective approach is the local, case-by-case study (Bordas et al., 2001). In fact, if one of the main purposes of training must be behavioral change, it is crucial that the course be interesting and convincing enough, since both enforcement and positive reinforcement (Catania, 2000) are very difficult to administer to crews typically working in isolation (Olson and Austin, 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text