Brief communication and research note
A comparison of two direct-observation methods for measuring daytime safety belt use

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00069-0Get rights and content

Abstract

This study compared two methods for measuring front-outboard shoulder-belt use: looking into vehicles when they stopped at a traffic control device (SVDO) and looking into vehicles as they traveled along a traffic corridor (MVDO). The reliability of the latter method has been questioned and certain surveys, such as the National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), use both methods to estimate safety belt use. In one experiment, the methods were compared on overall belt use rates and reliability. A second experiment investigated the effect that vehicle speed had on an observer's ability to measure accurately belt use using the MVDO method. The results showed that daytime belt use rates between methods were nearly identical and inter-method reliability was quite high, indicating that front-outboard shoulder-belt use can be measured identically with either method. The second experiment showed that measurement accuracy was not affected by vehicle speeds of up to 60 mph and that overall accuracy was above 95%.

References (10)

  • D.W. Eby et al.

    Direct observation of safety belt use in Michigan: Fall 1994

    (1994)
  • L. Evans

    Traffic safety and the driver

    (1991)
  • Milton, E. Personal communication, NHTSA;...
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Guidelines for state observational surveys of safety belt and motorcycle helmet use

    Federal Register

    (1992)
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Observed safety belt use in 1994

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

  • Do reminder signs promote use of safety belts?

    2000, Annals of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    During the “sign alone” phase, rates of safety belt use increased from a baseline rate of 31% to 44% to 41% to 53% at one parking lot, and from 34% to 60% to 51% to 67% in the second parking lot. Pairing the sign with a prompter resulted in larger increases: from 31% to 44% to 62% to 77% in the first parking lot, and from 34% to 60% to 68% to 84% in the second parking lot.14 The authors concluded that the “sign alone” condition produced a small but significant increase in the safety belt use, but use of the sign plus a human prompter was more effective for promoting safety belt use.

View full text