Paper
Child pedestrian injury taxonomy based on visibility and action

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)00074-VGet rights and content

Abstract

With data from multidisciplinary investigations of child pedestrian injuries in Chicago, a new and simpler four-category taxonomy is presented based on the process that led to the collision. Two dimensions are recognized: the visibility of the child and/or the vehicle immediately prior to the event and the rapidity of action, either movement or change in direction, of the victim or the vehicle. The taxonomy is neutral with respect to responsibility for the collision and accommodates the findings of other researchers.

This classification scheme is tested empirically using objective data elements such as child gender and age and event location. It is further tested using the results of a multidisciplinary causal sequence reconstruction of each injury event, based on such factors as child's psychological character, traffic risks, driver behavior, visibility obstructions, whether the child negotiated part of the street before being struck, and child's activities immediately prior to the injury. The results show that events in the categories in this new taxonomy are distinctly different from each other, and that the structure is useful for identifying and organizing interventions.

References (21)

  • P.F. Agran et al.

    Limitations of data compiled from police reports on pediatric pedestrian and bicycle motor vehicle events

    Accident Analysis & Prevention

    (1990)
  • D.F. Preusser et al.

    Reducing child pedestrian accidents through public education

    Journal of Safety Research

    (1984)
  • H.H. Van der Molen

    Child pedestrian's exposure, accidents and behavior

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (1981)
  • T.M. Achenbach

    The child behavior profile II, boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16

    Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology

    (1978)
  • T.M. Achenbach et al.

    Empirically based assessment of the behavioral/emotional problems of 2- and 3-year-old children

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1987)
  • G. Alpern et al.

    Developmental profile manual

    (1972)
  • S.P. Baker et al.

    The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care

    Journal of Trauma

    (1974)
  • D. Baumrind

    Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior

    Genetic Psychology Monographs

    (1967)
  • D. Baumrind et al.

    Socialization practices associated with dimensions of competence in preschool boys and girls

    Child Development

    (1967)
  • K.K. Christoffel et al.

    Kids ‘n’ cars, an ongoing study of pedestrian injuries: Description and early findings

    Children's Environment Quarterly

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • An examination of the intersection environment associated with perceived crash risk among school-aged children: using street-level imagery and computer vision

    2020, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Combining street-level imagery and the scene labeling approach may overcome this limitation by acquiring data on what people typically experience and perceive at the eye-level on the ground (Li et al., 2015). The ability of scene labeling methods to analyze the urban built environment at the eye-level also provides the advantage of measuring the visibility of pedestrians and drivers, which is one of the important factors in urban traffic safety (Dadashova et al., 2016; Hills, 1980; Retting et al., 2003; Schofer et al., 1995). For instance, Meir et al. (2013) suggested that pedestrians’ traffic crashes tend to take place at intersections or curves where visibility is obstructed by the road’s curvature, fixed objects, parked vehicles, darkness, or other visibility limitations because these visibility obstructions interfere with the pedestrian’s ability to detect oncoming vehicles while also obstructing the motor vehicle drivers’ vision, preventing drivers from noticing pedestrians, who may be masked by obstructions (Aoki & Moore, 1996; Petch & Henson, 2000).

  • A pedestrian experience framework to help identify impediments to walking by mobility-challenged pedestrians

    2018, Journal of Transport and Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    MCPs include disabled, pregnant women, children, and aged adults (Magagnin et al., 2014; MOLEG, 2017). MCPs have many difficulties in walking due to their physical, motor, cognitive, attentive, behavioral, and psychological characteristics (Schofer et al., 1995; Schieber and Thompson, 1996; Langlois et al., 1997; Jacobsen et al., 2000; Carmeli et al., 2002; DiMaggio and Durkin 2002; Clarke et al., 2008; Rantakokko et al., 2009; Romero-Ortuno et al., 2010; Dommes and Cavallo, 2011; D’Orio et al., 2012; Safe Kids Canada, 2014; Upuji et al., 2016). They often have lower levels of physical activities than others (Van Holle et al., 2014; MOLIT, 2017), which is related to their health problems such as clinical depression, diabetes, and obesity (Fox, 1999; Jylhä et al., 2001; Warburton et al., 2006).

  • The relative risk of nearside accidents is high for the youngest and oldest pedestrians

    2012, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    The attention failure account is also consistent with many descriptions of child pedestrian accidents, and recent cognitive studies. Taxonomies of accident configurations involving children highlight types such as the ‘mid-block dart-out’, where the child enters the road apparently without considering traffic at all (e.g. Snyder and Knoblauch, 1971; Schofer et al., 1995). Developmental psychologists have demonstrated links between specific attention skills measured in the laboratory and simulated or real road crossing behaviour (Barton, 2006; Dunbar et al., 2001; Whitebread and Neilson, 2000).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text