The call for help after an injury road accident

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(93)90051-WGet rights and content

Abstract

How soon will the authorities receive a call for help after an injury road accident? In urban Missouri 70% of the calls were received in less than five minutes. But in rural Missouri only 34% of the calls came in that quickly. These figures are based on a merge of police and emergency medical services accident data in which the earlier of the two notifications is selected as the time of first call. Police estimates of accident time are used here to calculate the interval from accident to the first call. The police estimates lack precision. This is shown by the high percentage of rounded numbers. As averages, however, these estimates show little evidence of bias. In urban areas, delays are related to time of day and type of road system, while in rural areas, remoteness of location is an added factor. Difficulty in finding a telephone quickly in certain road environments can be a problem. However, installing more stationary telephones along roads may be inefficient. Large areas would have to be covered to insure even a modest reduction in delays. More thought, therefore, should be given to the use of innovative vehicle-to-satellite technologies.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Motorcycle safety after-dark: The factors associated with greater risk of road-traffic collisions

    2020, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is likely that this time refers to when the police officer was notified of the RTC (Imprialou and Quddus, 2019). The average interval between an RTC occurring and the police being notified is around 5–5.9 min (Brodsky, 1993; Blatt et al., 2009). For the current data, an RTC recorded 6 min after its occurrence would result in a change in solar altitude of between 0.6 to 0.9°.

  • Evaluating adverse rural crash outcomes using the NHTSA State Data System

    2015, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    While crash prevention is clearly the most cost-effective approach, the post-event, environmental cell of the Haddon Matrix is also important. Part of the increased crash mortality in rural areas may result from reduced access to an effective trauma care system integrated with local EMS (Brodsky, 1993; Muelleman and Mueller, 1996; Mueller et al., 1988). Specifically, this may involve delays in activating EMS or barriers in the transportation of injured persons to appropriate hospitals, but the relative importance of these systemic factors is difficult to separate from the effects of person-level or event-level factors.

  • Development of road safety performance indicators for trauma management in Europe

    2013, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    The potential to reduce fatalities by means of early and appropriate medical treatment is associated with “survivable” injuries, which can be observed in the second and third periods after the crash, i.e. during the “golden hour” and later period of hospital treatment (OECD, 1999; Sasser et al., 2005). Evidence from evaluation studies demonstrates that a lower EMS response time is associated with reduced fatality rates (Brodsky, 1993; Feero et al., 1995; Maio et al., 1995; Henriksson et al., 2001). Concerning the impact of improved hospital treatment, evaluation studies found that the adjusted risk of death was lower in trauma centres than in regular hospitals (MacKenzie et al., 2006) and that the improved organization of the TM system is associated with a reduction in mortality (Sampalis et al., 1999; Mann et al., 1999).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text