Safety effects of speed reducing measures in danish residential areas

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(92)90068-TGet rights and content

Abstract

On May 1, 1977 a new code was introduced into the Danish Road Traffic Act. The result was a change in layout and speed limits in a great number of residential streets; in most cases the streets were transformed into 30 km/h streets and in few cases into 15 km/h streets. In addition to speed signs, both types of streets were equipped with speed reducing measures. Based on experiences from a selection of experimental streets, mostly 30 km/h streets, different, but very positive effects were found. Overall there was a reduction in the mean speed in these areas of 11 km/h. On the 223 km, 30 km/h streets there was a reduction of 77 accidents and 88 casualties within a period of three years. These reductions were caused by the implementation of speed signs, speed reducing measures, and a reduction in traffic. On the basis of 44 experimental streets, where traffic was recorded both before and after the changes, the reduction in risk of casualties, i.e. the number of casualties per road user km, was 72%, while the risk of accidents seemed to be unchanged. Considering serious injuries alone, a very high reduction of 78% was found. Accidents included in the study consist of all police reported accidents, i.e. accidents with personal injury as well as damage only accidents.

References (4)

  • U. Engel et al.

    §40 gaders sikkerhed. En analyse af politirapporterede ulykker på danske §40 gader baseret på ulykkestætheder før hhv. efter ændring af gadestatus

  • U. Engel et al.

    §40 gaders sikkerhed. En analyse af politirapporterede ulykker på 44 §40 gader og 52 kontrolgader baseret pa ulykkesfrekvenser for hhv. efter ændring af gadestatus

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (41)

  • Assessing the safety effectiveness of citywide speed limit reduction: A causal inference approach integrating propensity score matching and spatial difference-in-differences

    2022, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    For example, the raised speed limit was found to increase total crashes (Alhomaidat et al., 2020; Brown et al., 1990; Castillo-Manzano et al., 2019; Cetin et al., 2018; Kockelman et al., 2006; Kockelman, 2006; Kwayu et al., 2020; Rock, 1995; Wong et al., 2005) and fatal or severe injury crashes (Ashenfelter and Greenstone, 2004; Bartle et al., 2003; Baum et al., 1989; Baum et al., 1990; Chang et al., 1993; Farmer et al., 1999; Gallaher et al., 1989; Garber and Graham, 1990; Lave and Elias, 1994; Lopez-Aparicio et al., 2020; Malyshkina and Mannering, 2008; McKnight and Klein, 1990; Ossiander and Cummings, 2002; Patterson et al., 2002; Sayed and Sacchi, 2016; Wagenaar et al., 1990). Of nineteen observational before-after studies on the safety effectiveness of speed limit reduction, 84.21% found that the speed limit reduction would improve safety performance, leading to decreases in total crashes (Fridman et al., 2020; Isaksson-Hellman and Töreki, 2019; Islam and El-Basyouny, 2015; Islam et al., 2016; Mammen et al., 2019; Scharping, 1994), fatal or severe injury crashes (De Pauw et al., 2014; Engel, 1990; Engel and Thomsen, 1992; Finch, 1994; Nilsson, 1990), minor injury or PDO crashes (Grundy et al., 2009; Johansson, 1996; Park et al., 2010), and injury crashes (Elvik, 2013; Li and Graham, 2016). However, inconsistent findings with the aforementioned ones were also concluded in the literature regarding the safety effectiveness of speed limit changes.

  • Effects of 20 mph interventions on a range of public health outcomes: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis

    2020, Journal of Transport and Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    Following duplicate removal (n = 2100), 4069 studies were included for title/abstract screening. After initial screening, 117 studies met the eligibility criteria and following full text screening 13 papers reporting 11 studies, met the inclusion criteria (Atkins et al., 2018; Brilon and Blanke, 1993; Brilon and Blanke, 1990; Grundy et al., 2009; Steinbach et al., 2011; Webster et al., 2006; Layfield et al., 2003; Engel Thomsen, 1992; Webster Layfield, 2007; Li Graham, 206; Vis et al., 1992; Owen, 2005; Gaca et al., 2016). Included studies were all European and published 1990–2018: UK (6); Demark (2); the Netherlands (1); Germany (1); and Poland (1).

  • Effect of speed hump characteristics on pavement condition

    2017, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)
    Citation Excerpt :

    Not to be confused with a speed hump, a speed bump is a raised area commonly used in parking and on some private roadways, which is generally from 7.50 to 15.0 cm in height with a length of 0.30–0.90 m in the direction of travel (Ewing, 1999; ITE, 1993). Engel and Thomsen attributed a speed reducing effect of 1 km per hour reduction in driving speed to every centimeter increase in height of the hump (Engel and Thomsen, 1992). Examples of previous studies that examined the effect of speed humps/bumps of different characteristics on the decrease of vehicle speed, including: Antic et al. (2013), Pau and Angius (2001) and Mahdy (2012).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text