Pedestrian safety at traffic signals: A study carried out with the help of a traffic conflicts technique

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(89)90004-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Most pedestrian accidents in built-up areas occur at intersections. Even after signalization the number of accidents involving pedestrians often remains high. After reviewing the published evidence, this paper describes how the Traffic Conflicts Techniques has been used to examine the risk to pedestrians at 120 intersections. The principal results indicate that signalization of a high-speed intersection (mean speed above 30 kmh in at least one arm) reduces pedestrian risk to approximately half. If mean speed in every arm is below 30 kmh signalization also reduces pedestrian risk, as long as most vehicles are not turning. Another finding from these studies was that a crosswalk should be located less than two meters from the intersection to optimize pedestrian safety. The conflict studies as well as analyses of accident data show that one should examine separately accidents between turning vehicles and “green-walking” pedestrians and accidents involving pedestrians walking against red light. The effect of an exclusive pedestrian signal phase (scramble) was tested at three sites and proved to be very safety-beneficial in a small town, while in Stockholm it did not prove effective because of a high percentage of red-walkers. Vehicle delay, as well as pedestrian delay, increased at all three sites. Data collected at 152 crosswalks has been used to estimate the parameters of a multivariate model of the frequency of “red-walking.” The size of the town and traffic volumes appear to be the major factors influencing this frequency. Additional insight has been obtained from personal interviews of 450 persons. These indicate that shorter waiting times and police enforcement are considered the most efficient measures to reduce the the frequency of red-walking.

References (14)

  • M. Short et al.

    Effects of traffic signal installation on accidents

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (1982)
  • K.L. Bång

    Signalreglering och trafiksäkerhet, en före- efterstudie

    Stockholms gatukontor, rapport nr. 14

    (1969)
  • M.H. Cameron et al.

    Pedestrian accidents and exposure in Australia

  • P. Gårder

    Theory for strong validation, application to Swedish results

  • C.A. Hydén

    Traffic-conflicts technique for determining risk

  • C. Hydén

    The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation—the Swedish traffic conflicts technique

  • International Committee on Traffic Conflicts Techniques (ICTCT)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (115)

  • Non-compliance behaviour of pedestrians and the associated conflicts at signalized intersections in India

    2022, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The careful observations of the violation patterns showed that the latter half of the red phase is the violation-dense period, which indicates that the pedestrians become impatient after waiting for too long and start crossing. The result was cross validated by the MLR model that suggested that violation prevalence increased with the increase in waiting time of pedestrians, which is consistent with past studies (Brosseau et al., 2013; Garder, 1989). However, Diependaele (2019) contradicted the finding and reported that red light violations increase with a decrease in the waiting time.

  • Macroscopic model of multidirectional pedestrian network flows

    2021, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
  • Planning for Safe and Secure Transport Infrastructure

    2021, International Encyclopedia of Transportation: Volume 1-7
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text