Psychosocial factors related to parental restraint of pre-school children in motor vehicles

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(88)90023-1Get rights and content

Abstract

While the use of safety restraints effectively reduces the risk of death or injury in accidents, many children still travel unrestrained in motor vehicles. Compulsory seat belt legislation in Australia increased rates of adult use dramatically, but did not have the same impact with children. In order to understand why levels of children's restraint use remain low, it is necessary to investigate parental factors related to use and non-use of restraints. This study assessed the rates of safety restraint use of parents and their pre-school children, and the socio-demographic, attitudinal and belief characteristics of parents which relate to children's restraint use, using the Health Belief Model as a basis for investigation. Restraint use for adults was substantially higher than for pre-school children. Children were more likely to be restrained if their parents were wearing seat belts, were married, were of high socioeconomic status, did not smoke, engaged in certain other preventive health behaviors on their children's behalf, traveled longer distances to pre-school and provided child seats for their children. In terms of the Health Belief Model, parents of restrained and unrestrained children differed in their evaluation of the “costs” and ‘benefits” of using restraints for their children, and in health locus of control. Parents of unrestrained children perceived the ‘costs” of restraint use, in terms of nuisance value, installation difficulty and financial cost, to be high. They were also less likely to believe that they could play a significant role in preventing injury to their children. Implications of these findings for safety restraint campaigns are discussed.

References (31)

  • C.W. Corben et al.

    Children wearing approved restraints and adults' belts in crashes

  • M.P. Eriksen et al.

    The application of health education principles to automobile child restraint programs

    Health Educ. Q.

    (1983)
  • G. Fhaner et al.

    Seat belts: relations between beliefs, attitude and use

    J.Appl. Psychol.

    (1974)
  • A.H. Ford

    Use of automobile restraining devices for infants

    Nurs. Res.

    (1980)
  • R.G. Frazier

    Hazards to health: effectiveness of seat belts in preventing motor vehicle injuries

    New Eng. J. Med.

    (1961)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Child restraint system use and its associated factors in Shenzhen

      2021, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      This was consistent with other findings that there was a lower CRS use rate during the short-distance trip. ( Webb et al., 1988; Gielen et al., 1984) Our study revealed that over three-fifths of parents did not always use CRS owing to the short trip distance, which was aligned with the trend. It seems worthy of specific attention in light of the finding that it is the short trip distance that is more likely to increase injury risk to children. (

    • Integrated choice and latent variable models for evaluating flexible transport mode choice

      2012, Research in Transportation Business and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      These psychological models – known as behavioural change models – were first developed and tested for other purposes, such as the analysis of smoking prevention, the interpretation of household consumption, the examination of environmental awareness, the intention to lose weight etc. Some of the most well known models are: the Need Opportunity Ability (NOA) Model (Meloni, Bez, & Spissu, 2009; Shiftan, 2008), the Health Belief Model (HBM) (Webb, Sanson-Fisher, & Bowman, 1988), the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), (Sonmez & Graefe, 1998), the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) (Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003), the Norm Activation Model (NAM) – (Hopper & Nielsen, 1991; Hunecke, Blobaum, Matthies, & Hoger, 2001), the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) – (Fergusson, Davis, & Skinner, 1999; INPHORMM, 1998; TAPESTRY, 2002) and the MaxSem Model (MAX Project, 2009). Most of these models are using the concept of behavioural stage, in order to explain the way that people formulate, consolidate or change their behaviour (Darnton, 2008; Rose & Marfurt, 2007).

    • Discrepancies between knowledge and practice of childhood motor vehicle occupant safety in Nova Scotia - A population-based study

      2012, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inconvenience and their child not wanting to use one have been reported by parents (Ramsey et al., 2000). In addition, parents may have a reduced perception of risk of injury in the case of a MVC involving their children, subsequently perceiving the cost or inconvenience of using a certain restraint system as outweighing any perceived benefit in the form of reduced risk of injury in a MVC (Ramsey et al., 2000; Webb et al., 1988; Will, 2005). These factors are not mutually exclusive.

    • Driver characteristics associated with child safety seat usage in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study

      2010, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, between the two locations, there is no demonstrated difference in behavior toward CSS usage, suggesting that advocacy efforts followed by legislation and enforcement are needed to curb such behavior. The distance traveled to the study location did not show any association with CSS usage in this study, but other studies have found lower CSS usage rates during short-distance trips (Gielen et al., 1984; Webb et al., 1988). Travel distance can be associated with exposure to enforcement activity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text