Skip to main content
Log in

Error and uncertainty in travel surveys

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transportation study home interview surveys normally underestimate the amount of trip-making by residents of a study area, and the data has to be adjusted subsequently to compensate for this effect. One important reason for the shortfall appears to be the incomplete recall and reporting of travel information by respondents. The paper examines the influence of the survey instrument on recall by comparing reported travel behaviour in two surveys conducted in the same town, one using a conventional travel diary and the other an activity diary. The latter format appears to encourage a more complete response, giving rise to significantly higher reported trip rates and travel times. The paper discusses some research and policy implications of this finding and concludes with tentative suggestions for improved travel survey instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alastair Dick and Associates (1978). RHTM Project Review, Final Draft, September 1978.

  • Ampt, E. (1981). “Recent advances in large-scale travel surveys,” P. T. R. C. Summer Annual Meeting, Transportation Models and Analysis Seminar, July.

  • Bonsall, P. W., Champernowne, A. F., Mason, A. C. and Wilson, A. G. (1977). “Transport Modelling: Sensitivity analysis and policy testing,” Progress in Planning 7 (3): 153–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brög, W. and Meyburg, A. H. (1981). “Consideration of non-response effects in large-scale mobility surveys,” Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C.

  • Bureau of Public Roads (1954). “Conducting a Home Interview Origin-Destination Survey,” Procudure Manual 2B, Public Administration Service, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, M. C. (1975). “Application of In-depth Interviewing Techniques to the Study of Travel Behaviour: Some preliminary results,” Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Working Paper (004/WP9).

  • Dumble, P. (1980). “Improving home interview travel survey techniques,” Australian Road Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 10, Part 5, pp. 252–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. E. and Mackinder, I. H. (1980). “Predictive accuracy of British Transport Studies,” P. T. R. C. Summer Annual Meeting, July. Seminar Proceedings, pp. 225–242.

  • Exeter City Council (1968). City of Exeter, Land Use Transportation Study, Interim Technical Report, June.

  • Freeman Fox and Associates (1974). Nottinghamshire and Environs Transportation Study: Data Collection and Surveys, December.

  • Gilbert, D. and Jessop, A. (1977). “Error and uncertainty in transport models,” P. T. R. C. Summer Annual Meeting, Proceedings Transportation Models Seminar, pp. 122–157.

  • Gilbert, D. and Jessop, A. (1978). “Taxonometric evaluation,’ Transportation 7 (2): 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M. (1979). “HATS: A technique for investigating household decisions,” Environment and Planning A, 11 (1): 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I. and Heggie, I. G. (1980). “Understanding Travel Behaviour,” Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford. Project Report (1191PR), p. 390.

  • Meyburg, A. H. and Brög, W. (1981). “The problem of validity in the empirical analysis of lion-home activity patterns,” Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C.

  • Moolman, B. A. (1979). “A fresh look at non-sampling errors in survey research,” Paper presented at the 5th Workshop 1179 of the DVWG, Grainau/Eibsee, W. Germany, November. (Also reported in Br6g and Meyburg, 1981).

  • Morrell, D. (1978). “Survey sample size and planning data requirements for trip generation models,” TRRL Laboratory Report 821.

  • Stopher, P. R. and Meyburg, A. H. (1979). Survey Sampling and Multivariate Methods for Social Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Book, D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talvitie, A. and Dehghani, Y. (1979). “A comparison of the observed and coded network travel time and cost measurements,” T. R. B. Annual Meeting; Washington, January.

  • Traffic Research Corporation Ltd. (1969). Merseyside Area Land Use and Transportation Study, Technical Report 5.

  • Train, K. E. (1978). “The sensitivity of parameter estimates to data specification in mode choice models,” Transportation, 7 (3): 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoorn, T. (1979). “Travel behaviour and the total activity pattern,” Transportation 8 (4): 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1979). “The uncertainties of opinion polls,” New Scientist, 26 April: 251–253.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarke, M., Dix, M. & Jones, P. Error and uncertainty in travel surveys. Transportation 10, 105–126 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165261

Keywords

Navigation