Table 2

Intersectional measures for historical redlining and contemporary racialized economic segregation on non-fatal shootings in Baltimore city (2015–2019)

Intersectional measureOutcome95% CI
Joint disparity*24(20 to 28)
Referent redlining disparity*4(1 to 8)
Referent segregation disparity*9(6 to 12)
Excess intersectional disparity*10(5 to 16)
Attributable proportion of excess intersectional disparity†38%(17% to 55%)
  • *The disparity measures are reported as annual non-fatal shooting rates per 10 000 residents.

  • †The attributable proportion measure is reported as a percentage. The attributable proportion measure equals the excess intersectional disparity non-fatal shooting rate/mean average non-fatal shooting rate for sustained disadvantage tracts.