Data collection activities for replication of the Cardiff Model in the US process evaluation
| Data collection method and primary area(s) used | Sources (n) | Data collection focus |
| Document review (1)–(4) | Project proposal, contracts, reports, correspondence, meeting agendas and minutes, presentations, hospital and LE financial records | Identifying stakeholders, clarifying context, processes and activities, implementation costs |
| Cardiff Model Screening Tool (2), (3) | Cardiff Model partnership consensus decision (inclusive of hospital and LE representatives) | Identify useful data fields while decreasing burden on hospital staff |
| Nurse Satisfaction Survey (2) | ED RNs (n=78; 51% of 153 Cardiff Model trained ED registered nurses) | Satisfaction, utility and integration of Cardiff Model data collection screen |
| Hospital ED triage data (2) | ED triage times (April 2015 vs April 2016 triage chart time data) | Impact on total triage time of Cardiff Model data screen inclusion |
| Interviews (1)–(4) | Hospital administration (n=3) | Identifying processes to integrate Cardiff Model into the ED |
| Hospital implementation team leaders (n=3) | Implementation logistics, training, and integration into ED processes | |
| Hospital technology team (n=2) | Cardiff Model data collection survey integration into the electronic medical record | |
| Hospital nurse Cardiff Model champions (n=7) | Implementation feedback on the data collection survey and training | |
| Injury prevention partnership members (n=8) | Capacity building, lessons learnt, use of Cardiff Model data |
Note: Primary areas used include: (1) collaboration between the hospital and LE to form a community safety partnership; (2) building hospital capacity for data collection; (3) data aggregation and analysis and (4) developing and implementing violence prevention interventions based on the data.
ED, emergency department; LE, law enforcement.