Table 3

The effect of safety promotion intervention on the reduction of home safety problems

Attention-control groupSafety intervention groupEstimated difference in change* (intervention vs control)p Value
 MeanEstimated change in mean*MeanEstimated change in mean*
M (SD)†M (SE)p ValueM (SD)†M (SE)p Value
Analysis among the total sample (intent-to-treat, n=186 control, n=91 intervention)
Home safety problem score
 Baseline2.52 (1.58)2.36 (1.58)
 Six-month follow-up2.22 (1.44)−0.21 (0.15)0.1691.73 (1.55)−0.53 (0.23)0.021−0.32 (0.27)0.244
 Twelve-month follow-up2.43 (1.86)−0.04 (0.15)0.7941.81 (1.44)−0.58 (0.21)0.006−0.54 (0.25)0.035
Analysis of intervention effect among compliers only (n=131 control, n=65 intervention)‡
Home safety problem score
 Baseline2.43 (1.46)2.33 (1.69)
 Six-month follow-up2.17 (1.42)−0.21 (0.16)0.1991.50 (1.17)−0.77 (0.24)0.002−0.55 (0.29)0.060
 Twelve-month follow-up2.30 (1.79)−0.09 (0.16)0.5841.73 (1.44)−0.65 (0.23)0.005−0.57 (0.28)0.045
Analysis of intervention effect among non-compliers only (n=55 control, n=26 intervention)‡
Home safety problem score
 Baseline2.77 (1.84)2.45 (1.27)
 Six-month follow-up2.45 (1.54)−0.13 (0.37)0.7212.88 (2.59)0.66 (0.58)0.2600.79 (0.69)0.254
 Twelve-month follow-up2.85 (2.06)0.17 (0.33)0.5952.07 (1.46)−0.30 (0.46)0.506−0.48 (0.56)0.396
  • *The changes over time and the differences in the changes over time between the safety promotion group and the control group and p values were estimated based on the linear mixed models including time, intervention and interactions between time and intervention.

  • †Sample-estimated means and SDs.

  • ‡Compliers are participants who attended ≥1 session; non-compliers are participants who did not attend any sessions; the analysis of intervention effect among compliers/non-compliers included the compliers/non-compliers who had missing values for home safety problems at one or two assessments.