TableĀ 2

Methodological appraisal of studies included in the review

ArticleSelectionMeasurementConfoundingGeneralisability to entire dog population
Messam et al31 USA/JamaicaSelected from veterinary population, possibly selecting dogs that are better managed in the populationBite data: owner recallDesexing data: owner recallMultifactorial analysis controlling for measured confoundersDog bites from population going to veterinary clinics
Messam et al32 USA/JamaicaSelected from veterinary population, possibly selecting dogs that are better managed in the populationBite data: owner recallDesexing data: owner recallMultifactorial analysis controlling for measured confoundersDog bites from population going to veterinary clinics
Gershman et al30 USA54.9% of eligible cases included, cases from notified dog bite reportBite data: objective from medical records
Control data: owner recall
Desexing data: owner recall
Multifactorial analysis controlling for measured confoundersSevere dog bites towards non-household members
Shuler et al33 USACases from notified dog report
Missing data for non-licensed dogs, possible bias away from the null
Bite data: 19.8% of attacks on a family member (expected underreporting of bites)Desexing data: from licensed database and from bite reportUnivariate analysis reported for desexing effect estimateDog bites from entire population
Guy et al28 CanadaSelected from veterinary population, possibly selecting dogs that are better managed in the population.
Control include dogs that may have bitten strangers, expected bias towards the null
Case-control classification: possible misclassification of exposure and outcome from owner recall biasMultifactorial analysis controlling for measured confoundersDog bites from population going to veterinary clinics and certain type of dog bites
Guy et al34 CanadaSelected from veterinary population, possibly selecting dogs that are better managed in the population
Case-control include dogs that may have bitten strangers, expected bias towards the null
Bite classification: known misclassification of exposure and outcome as found in the 2001 study, likely introduced biasMultifactorial analysis controlling for measured confoundersDog bites from population going to veterinary clinics and certain type of dog bites