Table 2

Compliance to individual ordinance requirements after effective date, by city and store ownership type, %

				Single owner-operator			Corporate/franchise
	Full sample (N=594)	Houston (n=305)	Dallas (n=289)	Overall (n=339)	Houston (n=175)	Dallas (n=164)	Overall (n=253)	Houston (n=130)	Dallas (n=123)
Registration*	79	68	90†	80	71	88‡	77	63	93§
Registration sticker posted	64	48	81†	61	45	78‡	68	52	85§
Training*	79	70	89†	77	67	88‡	82	74	91§
Trespass affidavit posted	69	54	84†	63	47	79‡	77¶	64**	91§,††
Signage posted	26	16	36†	18	10	27‡	36¶	25**	47§,††
Visibility	60	65	54†	55	65	46‡	66¶	65	66††
Alarm system	71	79	61†	70	81	59‡	71	78	64§
Drop safe	46	57	34†	47	62	32‡	43	50**	36§
Cash limit policy*	79	71	88†	73	60	86‡	88¶	85**	91§,††
Camera	73	58	88†	69	55	84‡	77¶	62	93§,††

*As reported by store manager.
†Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences between cities.
‡Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences between cities for single owner-operator stores.
§Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences between cities for corporate/franchise stores.
¶Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences by store ownership type.
**Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences by store ownership type in Houston.
††Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests statistically significant (p<0.05) for differences by store ownership type in Dallas.