Indicators† | Validation criteria‡ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Case definition | 2. Serious injury | 3. Case ascertainment | 4. Representativeness | |
*10 point rating system: 0 = validation criterion not satisfied; 10 = validation criterion completely satisfied; 1–9 = validation criterion incompletely satisfied—the magnitude of the score indicating the degree to which the criterion is satisfied. | ||||
** = One rater was unable to assess this indicator. | ||||
†See box 1 for a statement of the non-fatal indicators. | ||||
‡See “Consensus outcome” for a full statement of the criteria included in the validation tool for indicators of injury incidence. | ||||
§Ratings shown in bold were made by the assessor living in that country (for example, the assessment of C1 shown in bold text was made by the Canadian assessor). | ||||
C1: Police-serious | 0§,0,4 | 2,6,7 | 6,6,8 | 7,8,8 |
C1.8: Police-serious-vulnerable | 0,4,** | 2,7,** | 5,8,** | 5,8,** |
NZ1: Police-all | 0,0,2 | 0,3,4 | 4,4,5 | 5,6,7 |
NZ2: Hospitalisations | 0,0,3 | 2,5,6 | 5,5,8 | 8,8,10 |
UK1: Police-serious | 0,6,10 | 4,5,8 | 4,7,9 | 7,9,9 |
UK2: Police-slight | 0,5,10 | 0,1,4 | 4,4,5 | 6,7,9 |