Table 3

Fatal crashes involving a driver or pedestrian with 0.01% BAC or higher 10 years before and 10 years after initiation of the Fighting Back programs

	Ratio of fatal crashes involving drivers or pedestrians with BAC 0.01%+ v 0.00%
Fighting Back FBAT comparison communities	Before FB 0.01%+ v no alcohol ratio number		After FB 0.01%+ v no alcohol ratio number		% Change	Program effect OR (95% CI)
NS, not significant.
Kansas City (FB)	1.52	443/291	1.29	359/278	−15%	0.83
Columbia, Springfield, St Louis	1.11	337/303	1.14	348/305	+3%	(0.61–1.12)
Milwaukee (FB)	1.44	252/175	0.72	161/224	−50%	0.55
Madison, Racine	1.32	74/56	1.20	59/49	−9%	(0.31–0.98)
San Antonio (FB)	1.90	794/418	1.52	653/430	−20%	0.95
Dallas, Ft Worth, Houston	1.85	3146/1700	1.56	2472/1587	−16%	(0.79–1.15)
Santa Barbara (FB)	1.95	41/21	1.61	37/23	−18%	0.87
Carlsbad, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica	1.04	117/112	0.99	80/81	−5%	(0.37–2.02)
Vallejo (FB)	1.32	58/44	0.74	35/47	−44%	0.69
San Bernardino, Stockton	1.06	265/251	0.86	212/247	−19%	(0.63–0.76)
Pooled results, five FB communities targeting alcohol availability and increased treatment (FBAT)
Total FB	1.67	1588/949	1.24	1245/1002		0.78
Total comparison	1.63	3939/2422	1.40	3171/2269		(0.64, 0.95)
			Heterogeneity: p = 0.04		Program effect: p = 0.01	Relative reduction: ↓22%
Pooled results, three FB programs covering entire community (FBAT)
Santa Barbara, Vallejo, Milwaukee	1.46	351/240	0.79	233/294		0.69
Comparison	1.09	456/419	0.93	351/377		(0.63, 0.76)
			Heterogeneity: NS		Program effect: p<0.0001	Relative reduction: ↓31%
Seven FB communities not targeting alcohol availability and increased treatment
Total FB	1.08	1013/941	0.86	905/1047		1.31
Comparison	1.05	1225/1169	0.75	944/1266		(0.93, 1.85)
			Heterogeneity: p = 0.002		Program effect: NS	Relative change: ↑31%