RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 988 Intimate partner violence and networking: what role for health services? Strategy in Coimbra
JF Injury Prevention
JO Inj Prev
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP A351
OP A352
DO 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042156.988
VO 22
IS Suppl 2
A1 Redondo, João
A1 Fazendeiro, Anabela
A1 Bombas, Teresa
A1 Castela, Eduardo
A1 Veiga, António
A1 Pereira, Filipa
A1 Mendes, Odete
A1 Alarcão, Madalena
A1 Monteiro, António
A1 Armindo, Henrique
A1 Garcia, Paula
A1 Morais, Isabel
A1 Batista, Emilia
A1 Mota, Fátima
A1 Cardoso, Natália
A1 Sarmento, Vânia
A1 Lemos, Rosário
A1 Rosado, Sara
A1 Morais, Generosa
A1 Correia, Ana
A1 Carvalho, Dulce
A1 Teixeira, Lurdes
A1 Dourado, Ana
A1 Caldeira, Salomé
A1 Jorge, António
YR 2016
UL http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/22/Suppl_2/A351.3.abstract
AB Background Violence by intimate partners (IPV) can be prevented and its impact reduced. This calls for to deal with violence from a public health perspective, according the ecological model, associated to a multidisciplinary and multisectoral networking approach. In Coimbra various sectors are working together from 2000, in tackling the problem of IPV. Health sector is an active and valuable ally in the global response to violence and brings a variety of advantages and assets to this work, from primary to terciary prevention, including programs for victims and perpetrators.Description of the problem IPV is a serious problem that occurs in all countries, among heterosexual or same-sex couples. The consequences are profound, extending beyond the health and happiness of individuals to affect the well-being of entire communities.Results Our strategies are addressed to prevention (al all levels). We deal with violence taking steps to understand the range of factors that put people at risk for violence and protect them from experiencing or perpetrating violence. Our fundamental goal is to stop IPV before it begins. Networks “Violence´s Group: Information, Research, Intervention” (2002), “School Against Violence” (2007), along with the training of 480 professionals (health, other sectors) in our region (2009–2012), in the area of prevention of IPV, are examples of our networking strategy. The Family Violence Unit, UVF (2004) - CHUC, integrates both networks; of the 1400 cases (2/3 women, 1/3 men) at UVF, we did not record any murder to date. Our strategy is recognised at regional and national levels.Conclusions We believe that prevent efforts associated to investigation and a networking strategy (from micro to macrosystem, throughout the life cycle), at individual, family, community, and political levels, are one of the keys to prevent IPV.