PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Leah L Thompson
AU  - Frederick P Rivara
AU  - Rajiv C Ayyagari
AU  - Beth E Ebel
TI  - Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
AID  - 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601
DP  - 2013 Aug 01
TA  - Injury Prevention
PG  - 232--237
VI  - 19
IP  - 4
4099  - http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/4/232.short
4100  - http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/19/4/232.full
SO  - Inj Prev2013 Aug 01; 19
AB  - Objectives The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians. Methods Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site. Results Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians. Conclusions Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury.