Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Injury prevention in the US Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting programme
  1. Wendy Shields1,
  2. Evelyn Shiang1,
  3. Elise Omaki1,
  4. Anne Kenney2,
  5. Andrea C Gielen1
  1. 1Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  2. 2Multinational Client Group, Mercer, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Wendy Shields, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; wshield1{at}jhu.edu

Abstract

Background Many home-based interventions have been demonstrated to reduce unintentional and intentional injuries in young children aged 0–4 years, but an understanding of their inclusion in federally-funded home visiting programmes in the USA is needed.

Methods The study team administered a survey to key informants at each of the 21 home visiting models approved for United States Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program funding being implemented in 2023. Respondents were based across the United States and in other developed countries. The survey collected information about the content used by models to address unintentional injury, parental health/wellbeing, and child abuse/neglect in children aged 0-4 years.

Results Completed surveys were returned by all respondents (n=21). Most models reported the inclusion of some unintentional injury, parental health/well-being and child abuse/neglect content. While models on average covered four of the five child abuse/neglect topics listed, only five of the nine topics listed for unintentional injury and parental health/well-being were covered. Among the services used by models to address topics, covering content via standardised curriculum and referrals were the most frequent while less than one-quarter of models (n=5) provided families with safety equipment to address unintentional injury. Less than half of the models evaluated outcomes from their injury prevention services, and no models conducted cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Conclusions Home visiting programmes are a promising way to reduce injuries in children at high risk, but further development and evaluation of their injury prevention content could increase their impact in the USA.

  • Child
  • Environmental Modification
  • Policy
  • Surveys
  • Health Disparities
  • Education

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Deidentified participant data are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Deidentified participant data are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @eliseomaki

  • Contributors WS and AK conceived the idea for and designed the study. ES acquired the data. EO led the analysis. WS and ES drafted the manuscript. ACG provided an editorial review. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version. WS is the guarantor.

  • Funding This study was funded by grant number 1R49CE003090 from the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.