Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Financial burden of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in football (soccer) players: an Australian cost of injury study
  1. Andrew George Ross1,
  2. Blaise Agresta2,
  3. Marnee McKay3,
  4. Evangelos Pappas4,
  5. Tegan Cheng5,
  6. Kerry Peek1
  1. 1Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  4. 4School of Medicine and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
  5. 5Faculty of Medicine and Health & Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Andrew George Ross, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney NSW 2050, New South Wales, Australia; andrewgeorgeross{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the financial burden of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in amateur football (soccer) players in Australia over a single year, including both direct and indirect cost.

Methods Available national direct and indirect cost data were applied to the annual incidence of ACL reconstructions in Australia. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted total and mean costs (ACL and osteoarthritis (OA)) were calculated for amateur football (soccer) players in Australia using an incidence-based approach.

Results The estimated cost of ACL reconstructions for amateur football players is $A69 623 211 with a mean total cost of $A34 079. The mean indirect costs are 19.8% higher than the mean direct costs. The mean indirect costs are lower in female (11.5%, $A28 628) and junior (15.3%, $A29 077) football players. The mean ACL costs are 3–4-fold greater than the mean OA costs ($A27 099 vs $A6450, respectively), remaining consistent when stratified by sex and age group. Our model suggests that for every 10% increase in adherence to injury prevention programmes, which equates to approximately 102 less ACL injuries per year, $A9 460 224 in ACL costs could be saved.

Conclusion While the number of ACL reconstructions per year among football players in Australia is relatively small, the annual financial burden is high. Our study suggests that if injury prevention exercises programmes are prioritised by stakeholders in football, significant cost-savings are possible.

  • Sports / Leisure Facility
  • Economic Analysis
  • Burden Of Disease

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @AndrewRoss82

  • Contributors The first draft of this paper was prepared by AR in collaboration with KP, MK and EP. AR takes ownership of the study concept and design. BA supervised and contributed to the financial aspects of the study, including analysis and interpretation of data. All authors reviewed initial drafts for substantive inputs and approved the final version of the article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.