You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Brief report
Examining injury-related mortality disparities for American Indians/Alaskan Natives in rural Wisconsin
  1. Jakob Anibas
  1. University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Jakob Anibas, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55108, USA; aniba009{at}umn.edu

Abstract

This study aims to identify potential injury-related mortality disparities for American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/ANs) within the rural counties of one US state, Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health database was used to compare injury-related mortality for AI/ANs and whites in rural counties from 2016 to 2020. Both unintentional and intentional injuries were examined. This study found that AI/ANs were 62% more likely to die of an injury compared with whites in rural counties (relative risk (RR): 1.62; 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.86). When looking at injury-related mortality across various age groups, the 18–44-year-old age group had the largest injury-related mortality gap for AI/ANs compared with whites (RR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.36 to 3.44). This study presents evidence that AI/ANs face significant injury-related mortality disparities compared with whites in rural counties.

  • Mortality
  • Rural
  • Health Disparities

https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2022-044764

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors The author is responsible for all data and results presented in this study.

    • Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.