Article Text

Download PDFPDF
State-level teen dating violence education laws and teen dating violence victimisation in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis of 36 states
  1. Karisa K Harland1,2,
  2. J Priyanka Vakkalanka1,3,
  3. Corinne Peek-Asa4,
  4. Audrey F Saftlas3
  1. 1Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  2. 2Injury Prevention Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  3. 3Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  4. 4Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Karisa K Harland, Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; kari-harland{at}uiowa.edu

Abstract

Background Approximately 10% of teens report experiencing sexual dating violence (SDV) or physical dating violence (PDV), collectively represented as teen dating violence (TDV). This study examines the association between laws incorporating TDV education in schools on TDV prevalence.

Methods TDV prevalence was estimated using data contributed by 36 states that participated in the 2015 Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance Survey (YRBS). Presence of TDV laws was determined using Westlaw, a legal search engine. The adjusted odds of TDV victimisation was estimated by the presence or absence of a state law and length of time the law was in effect using hierarchical regression modelling, clustering on state, controlling for individual-level and state-level covariates and incorporating the YRBS-weighted survey design.

Results After controlling for individual-level and state-level covariates, the presence of a law was not associated with TDV (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.97; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.06), PDV (aOR 1.12; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.33) or SDV (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.08). These odds did not differ across the length of time the policies were in effect.

Conclusions This study suggest that just the presence of a law incorporating TDV education in schools is not associated with reduced TDV victimisation but further research is needed to understand the association of the content of these laws and their implementation on TDV victimisation.

  • violence
  • cross sectional study
  • policy analysis
  • adolescent
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding All phases of this study were supported by the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center (R49CE002108)

  • Map disclaimer The depiction of boundaries on the map(s) in this article do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ (or any member of its group) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. The map(s) are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement No data are available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.