Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Differences in public support for handgun purchaser licensing
  1. Cassandra K Crifasi1,
  2. Elizabeth M Stone1,2,
  3. Beth McGinty1,
  4. Jon S Vernick1,
  5. Colleen L Barry1,
  6. Daniel W Webster1
  1. 1Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  2. 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Cassandra K Crifasi, Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; ckerche1{at}jhu.edu

Abstract

Objective To assess whether there are differences in support for handgun purchaser licensing.

Methods We used data from four waves of online, national polling on gun policy. To estimate differences in support for licensing across groups, we categorised respondents by whether they personally owned a gun, lived in a state with handgun purchaser licensing or lived in a state regulating private sales without a licensing system.

Results Eighty-four per cent of adults living in states with licensing supported the policy compared with 74% in states without the law (p<0.001). Seventy-seven per cent of gun owners living in states with licensing supported the policy vs 59% of gun owners in states without licensing (p<0.001).

Conclusions Support for licensing among gun owners living in states with these laws, many of whom have presumably gone through the process, was much higher than gun owners in states without such laws.

  • firearm
  • surveys
  • attitudes
  • legislation
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the study conception and design, data analysis and interpretation and drafting and revising of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.