Download PDFPDF

Further reflections on the seatbelt use and effectiveness issue
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Seatbelt immobilisers

    Dear Editor

    3500 people die every year in the UK from Road Traffic Accidents (RTAs), 40,000 are seriously injured with over 300,000 further casualties. The financial cost to the NHS is estimated at £3 billion a year.[1]

    Compulsory seat belt wearing is one of the most effective methods of reducing fatal and non-fatal injuries in motor vehicle crashes.[2] Averaged over all crashes, seat belts reduce driver fa...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.