Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial
  1. M Sznajder1,
  2. S Leduc2,
  3. M P Janvrin3,
  4. M H Bonnin4,
  5. P Aegerter5,
  6. F Baudier6,
  7. B Chevallier7
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics and Department of Public Health and Medical Informatics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France
  2. 2National Public Health Institute of Quebec, Rimouski, Québec, Canada
  3. 3French Committee for Health Education, Vanves, France
  4. 4Mother and Child Protection Service, Issy les Moulineaux, France
  5. 5Department of Public Health and Medical Informatics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France
  6. 6National Health Insurance, Paris, France
  7. 7Department of Pediatrics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Marc S Sznajder, Hopital Ambroise Paré, Service de Santé Publique et Information Médicale, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92100, Boulogne, France;
 marc.sznajder{at}apr.ap-hop-paris.fr

Abstract

Objectives: Home delivery of counselling and safety devices to prevent child injuries could help parents to adopt safe behaviour. The aim of this study was to test a safety kit designed and used in Quebec (Canada).

Design and subjects: One hundred families from four towns in the Paris suburbs were visited at home by nurses or doctors when their child reached 6–9 months. Selection criteria were: primipara, medical problem, psychological, and/or socioeconomic difficulties.

Interventions: During the first visit, 50 families (group 1) received counselling and a kit including preventive devices and pamphlets about indoor injuries and ways to avoid them. The other 50 families (group 2) received counselling but not the kit. A second home visit was made 6–8 weeks later.

Main outcome measures: The number of safety improvements was calculated 6–8 weeks after a first home visit. Perceived usefulness of the kit was collected from families and from interviewers.

Results: Between the first and the second visits, safety improvement was significantly higher in the group with the kit. This was mainly related to the risk of fall (p<0.02), fire and burns (p<0.001), poisoning (p<0.01), and suffocation (p<0.001). For improvement related to devices provided in the kit, the difference between the groups was significant: 64.4% improvement in group 1 versus 41.2% in group 2 (p<0.01). The relative risk (RR) of safety improvement between groups was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 1.80). Even for improvements not related to the kit the difference remained significant: 31.2% in group 1 versus 20.2% in group 2 (p<0.05); RR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.93).

Conclusion: Routine home visits by social services offer a good opportunity to tackle child injury prevention. Free delivery of prevention kits and counselling allow families to modify their behaviour and homes so as to reduce risks.

  • home safety
  • randomized trial
  • injury prevention kit
  • CI, confidence interval
  • PMI, Mother and Child Protection (service)
  • RR, relative risk
  • home safety
  • randomized trial
  • injury prevention kit
  • CI, confidence interval
  • PMI, Mother and Child Protection (service)
  • RR, relative risk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.