Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Splinters & Fragments
  1. A Guard
  1. Join Together, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Two contributors to the 1999 Institute of Medicine report on injury control have written a thoughtful article on the origins of the injury field within public health, its current role, and some challenges facing us. They argue that to define injury prevention as a public health problem does not mean that “the public health approach is the only useful perspective for thinking about injuries”. The article addresses certain controversies in the field: the costs of regulation, paternalism, balancing safety and freedom, and other ethical dilemmas. Finally, the authors contend that public health advocacy must be embraced but with caution and constraint. (


    How many times do we need to prove that bicycle helmet legislation is effective? This study, the accompanying editorial, and the letters to the editor in the following issue demonstrate a lack of consensus. Does helmet promotion reduce cycling? Are we reducing head injuries at the cost of increased heart disease? Read these pieces and find a colleague to debate it with you . . . (


    . Letters, all entitled “Butting heads over bicycle helmets”, by


    Most …

    View Full Text