Background A ‘Snakebite clinic’ was established in 1993 in an adult medicine ward in Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chittagong, Bangladesh with the aim to manage all the snakebite patients uniformly, promptly, ‘24/7’, with better documentation, reporting, and publication. In the last five years a total of 5256 snakebites cases have been admitted in this snakebite clinic from all over the south-east part of the country which creates a huge workload.

Snakebite is a medical emergency warrants immediate evaluation and management. Most events occur in rural areas. Unfortunately, most of the patients are used to be referred to tertiary hospitals due to fear of complications like respiratory and renal failure which cannot be managed at a primary or secondary hospital. In Bangladesh majority (~80%) snakebites are non-venomous. Even patients with envenomation can also get initial antivenom and/or supportive medication at peripheral hospitals and later referred to higher center when needed. This needs a coordinated setting among tertiary and peripheral hospitals.

Objective The system was developed with the objective of providing necessary emergencies and complete care, when possible, at peripheral hospitals and coordinated care for severe cases.

Description A ‘Hub and Spoke model’ has been introduced recently among this clinic and the subdistrict hospitals of Chittagong and district hospitals of adjacent districts, CMCH acting as the hub providing necessary advisory service to other centers and taking in the referred patients with severe complications.

Outcome In the last five years a total of 5256 snakebites cases have been admitted in this snakebite clinic. Out of this 66.22% were male and 33.78% were female. Among the total snakebite patients 25.4% were venomous. Green-pit viper, Cobra and Krait are the main venomous snakes. The total number of deaths in the last five years was 10.

Implications The ‘Hub and Spoke’ model has reduced the case load in CMCH and resulted in better management at peripheral hospitals and a coordinated management of patients with organ failure.

Conclusion It has led to reduced ‘time to antivenom’ and reduced the financial burden of the rural patients and ultimate improvement of the management of snakebite.