Article Text

Download PDFPDF
259 World conference on injury prevention and safety promotion 2024 (safety 2024)Stream 1: research based abstract – methodological/technological advancement
  1. Chen-Chun Shu1,
  2. Holger Moeller2,
  3. Tom Whyte3,
  4. Susan E Adams4,5,
  5. Lynne Bilston3,
  6. Jake Olivier6,
  7. Julie Brown1,2
  1. 1Injury Program, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
  4. 4School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
  5. 5Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  6. 6School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Background In March 2010, new child restraint legislation was implemented in NSW, Australia which required child passengers up to the age of seven travelling in a motor vehicle to be restrained in an age-appropriate restraint. There is conflicting evidence for the impact of changes in legislation. Studies that fail to find reductions in injury may be limited due to short periods of follow-up, the types of datasets used, and use of methods that assume an abrupt, specified change time-point directly aligned with date of the law change.

Objective To examine injury rates in child passengers before and after implementation of new child restraint legislation in NSW, Australia in March 2010, with a legislation time-period and a control group.

Methods An interrupted time series (ITS) approach in SAS was used to investigate the trends in hospital admitted injury among children aged 0–14. The data used for this analysis was collected through linked administrative datasets between 1 July 2001 and 31 March 2019. Monthly injury admission number and rate were aggregated and adjusted to the population. The temporal data was split into three time periods: pre-legislation (July 2001 – October 2007), legislation (November 2007 – December 2011), and post-legislation (January 2012 – March 2019).

Results Across the study period, there were 2940 injury cases. For each age group, 213 data-points/months over the study period were analysed. When comparing children aged 11–14 years and pre-legislation period, the injury rate for age-group zero, those 1–6 years, and 7–13 years reduced by 49% (IRR= 0.51, 95% CI= 0.12–2.12), 36% (IRR= 0.64, 95% CI= 0.30–1.37), and 37% (IRR= 0.63, 95% CI= 0.27–1.47), respectively, in the post-legislation period.

Conclusions The lack of detailed information on the use of child restraints in each injury case, coupled with the small sample size of severe injury cases, may limit the conclusiveness of our findings. Future research analysing media and market reports could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of legislation on child restraint usage at the population level.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.