Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Adolescents at the skatepark: identifying design features and youth behaviours that pose risk for falls
  1. Barbara A. Morrongiello1,
  2. Maria Amir1,
  3. Michael R Corbett1,
  4. Caroline Zolis1,
  5. Kelly Russell2
  1. 1 Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2 Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Barbara A. Morrongiello, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; bmorrong{at}uoguelph.ca

Abstract

Background Skateboarding is an increasingly popular leisure activity for youth, yet injuries due to falls are common. This study aimed to identify the features at skateparks and tricks performed by youth that pose an increased risk of falls in skateboarders.

Method Video recordings were unobtrusively taken at a large skatepark of youth designated as young (11–15 years) or old (16–20 years). Videos were coded to identify the popular skatepark features used and tricks performed, and to assign a fall severity outcome rating for each feature and each type of trick attempted.

Results The results identify features and tricks that pose increased risk of falling for youth at skateparks.

Conclusions Implications for injury prevention are discussed, including a consideration of environmental (skatepark design) and individual (youth behaviour) factors relevant to reducing skateboarding injuries due to falls among youth.

  • Youth
  • Fall
  • Recreation / Sports
  • Community Research
  • Risk Factor Research
  • Behavior

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors BM is the guarantor for this research. BM conceptualised the study, obtained funding and wrote the report and revision. MA and CZ collected and coded the data. MRC executed all analyses. KR consulted on the study and was a collaborator on the grant.

  • Funding This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (450221).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.