Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Trends in paediatric firearm-related encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic by age group, race/ethnicity and schooling mode in Tennessee
  1. Tara McKay1,
  2. Kelsey Gastineau2,
  3. Jesse O Wrenn3,
  4. Jin H Han3,
  5. Alan B Storrow3
  1. 1 Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  2. 2 Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  3. 3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tara McKay, Department of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; tara.mckay{at}vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

Background Increases in paediatric firearm-related injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic may be due to changes in where children and adolescents spent their time. This study examines changes in the frequency of paediatric firearm-related encounters as a function of schooling mode overall and by race/ethnicity and age group at a large trauma centre through 2021.

Methods We use data from a large paediatric and adult trauma centre in Tennessee from January 2018 to December 2021 (N=211 encounters) and geographically linked schooling mode data. We use Poisson regressions to estimate smoothed monthly paediatric firearm-related encounters as a function of schooling mode overall and stratified by race and age.

Results Compared with pre pandemic, we find a 42% increase in paediatric encounters per month during March 2020 to August 2020, when schools were closed, no significant increase during virtual/hybrid instruction, and a 23% increase in encounters after schools returned to in-person instruction. The effects of schooling mode are heterogeneous by patient race/ethnicity and age. Encounters increased among non-Hispanic black children across all periods relative to pre pandemic. Among non-Hispanic white children, encounters increased during the closure period and decreased on return to in-person instruction. Compared with pre pandemic, paediatric firearm-related encounters increased 205% for children aged 5–11 and 69% for adolescents aged 12–15 during the school closure period.

Conclusion COVID-19-related changes to school instruction mode in 2020 and 2021 are associated with changes in the frequency and composition of paediatric firearm-related encounters at a major trauma centre in Tennessee.

  • COVID-19
  • Firearm
  • Child
  • Adolescent

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data contain personal health information from hospital records and are not publicly available.

This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data contain personal health information from hospital records and are not publicly available.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @taramckayphd

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was first published online. Table 2 has been updated.

  • Contributors TM conceptualised and designed the study, conducted analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and is responsible for the overall content as guarantor. KG contributed to the conceptualisation and design of the study, interpretation of results, the initial draft of the manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. JOW contributed to the conceptualisation and design of the study, collected and prepared the data and reviewed and revised the manuscript. JHH and ABS contributed to the conceptualisation and design of the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding No funding was secured specifically for this study. This work was supported in part by the William Long Fellowship to KG.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.