Introduction On average, in the USA, 37 young children die every year due to vehicular heatstroke. Additionally, over half of these incidents occur when a parent/caregiver forgets a child in a vehicle. While various governmental and child safety advocacy groups have worked to raise awareness about these tragedies, rigorous studies have yet to be conducted that examine the current understanding and effectiveness of this public health messaging.
Methods This study will employ a mental models approach in order to identify differences that exist between experts’ and parents’/caregivers’ knowledge and beliefs surrounding the topic of children forgotten in hot cars. We interviewed a diverse set of 25 parents/caregivers and seven experts in order to construct and explore these mental models.
Results A comparative analysis was conducted, and three key differences were observed between these mental models. Unlike the experts, the parents/caregivers in the study emphasised perceived lifestyle factors (eg, low-income parent) as important elements in increasing an individual’s likelihood of forgetting a child in a car. Importantly, the parents/caregivers primarily obtained information from news reports, while experts believed public health campaigns would reach more parents/caregivers. Lastly, while experts stressed that this tragedy could happen to anyone, most parents/caregivers failed to acknowledge that they could forget their own child in a car.
Conclusions To confront this denial, future public health messaging must strive to engage and reach all parents/caregivers. This can be accomplished using a multifaceted messaging strategy that includes personalising core messaging, providing additional resources to media outlets and building rapport between key partners.
- mental model
- risk communication
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding American Meteorological Society 21st Century Campaign Graduate Fellowship and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1443117).
Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Meteorological Society, National Science Foundation or the childcare facilities.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval This study received IRB approval from the University of Georgia on 3 April 2015 (IRB ID: STUDY00002006).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Information provided in the article is available to be quoted and used in future publications; however, the transcripts from the original research are not available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.