Objectives To assess the influence of grain size distribution and moisture condition on aggregates’Setting and methods
Impact attenuation of sands and gravels was tested using a guided headform with a uniaxial accelerometer inside. The result for impact attenuation was the acceleration value of the headform measured from four different drop heights and the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) calculated from it. The acceptable HIC value of a shock-absorbing layer is <1000, that is, less than the critical fall height. Tests were conducted with both dry and wet materials.
Results The impact attenuation of a shock-absorbing layer made of loose aggregate is determined mainly by the following material factors: maximum grain size, median grain size, uniformity coefficient, fines content, grain shape and moisture content. In addition, the moisture content of aggregate, especially sands, has a major impact on its impact attenuation capacity. Of the studied sands, coarse and gravelly ones had the best impact attenuation properties. Most of the examined sands were uniformly graded. None of the grain properties of gravels proved more significant than the others. Yet, open-graded gravel (dominant grain size 4–8 mm) containing a small amount (about10%) of sand fraction 0.06–0.6 mm, but with hardly any coarse sand (0.6–2 mm), was found to have good impact attenuation.
Conclusions This study shows that the aggregates for shock-absorbing layer should always be tested wet in laboratory conditions corresponding the most critical situation. Standards should include a procedure for wet testing of aggregates.
- traumatic brain injury
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing or revision of the manuscript. Furthermore, each author certifies that this material or similar material has not been and will not be submitted to or published in any other publication before its appearance in the Injury Prevention. Category 1. Conception and design of study: TJ. Acquisition of data: TJ. Analysis and/or interpretation of data: TJ, KP, PK. Category 2. Drafting the manuscript: TJ. Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: TJ, KP, PK. Category 3. Approval of the version of the manuscript to be published: TJ, KP, PK.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.