Article Text

Download PDFPDF

190 Behind the wheel: driving exposure and participation from a randomised controlled trial program for older drivers
  1. Kristy Coxon1,2,
  2. Anna Chevalier1,
  3. Kate Hunter1,3,
  4. Julie Brown4,
  5. Elizabeth Clarke5,
  6. Kris Rogers4,
  7. Soufiane Boufous6,
  8. Rebecca Ivers4,
  9. Lisa Keay1
  1. 1The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. 2Western Sydney University, School of Science and Health
  3. 3The Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Australia
  4. 4Neuroscience Research Australia, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  5. 5Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  6. 6Transport and Road Safety, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia


Background We used a randomised controlled trial, with nested process evaluation, to measure the impact of the Behind the Wheel program on driving and community participation of drivers aged 75 years and older in northwest Sydney.

Methods Driving exposure/week was measured by continuous in-vehicle monitoring for 12 months. The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP), self-regulation behaviour profile and depressive symptoms were assessed at 12 months. Using intention-to-treat, generalised estimating equations modelled driving exposure, adjusting for weekly measures and ordinal regression for behaviour profiles. A logic model was built to explain program inputs, outputs and outcomes, based on relationships between process measures (program fidelity, acceptability, dose delivered and received) and program outcomes.

Results 380 drivers enrolled (mean age: 80 ± 4 years), 366/380 completed the study. There was no between group difference in distance driven/week over 12-months (−5.5 km, 95% CI: −24.5,13.5 km), or KAP (−0.1, 95% CI: −0.6,0.3). The intervention group were more engaged in self-regulation (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1,2.3). Older drivers with low-function in the intervention group were three times more likely to report depressive symptoms (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.04,9.2). Intervention participants who developed a retirement from driving plan, on average, reduced their total distance driven per week (38 km, 95% CI: −7.5,−68.7 km) and kilometres driven outside of daylight hours per week (7 km, 95% CI: −3.5,−10.4 km). Both understanding of program content (β = 2.1, p = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.2–4.1) and achieving a safe mobility plan (β = 3.3, p = 0.003, 95% CI: 1.2–5.5) were important to engagement in self-regulation. Females were 2.7 times more likely to develop safe mobility plans than men (OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1–6.9).

Conclusions The program engaged older drivers in self-regulation but this did not translate to reduced mileage. The logic model informs decision making to channel resources to those who will benefit most.

  • Driving
  • Ageing
  • Naturalistic driving
  • Education
  • Community mobility
  • Safety
  • Logic models
  • Process evaluation

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.