Article Text

Download PDFPDF

362 Gender differences in work tasks and injuries in agriculture
  1. Janne P Karttunen1,
  2. Risto H Rautiainen2
  1. 1TTS Work Efficiency Institute, Finland
  2. 2University of Nebraska Medical Centre, USA


Background Research indicates that farmers in general and livestock farmers in particular have an elevated risk of work-related adverse health outcomes. We investigated gender differences in work tasks and occupational injuries in the Finnish farming population covered by the mandatory workers’ compensation insurance.

Methods Insurance claims data were augmented with data from a postal survey containing questions about the relative division of farm work between male and female farmers.

Results Over the 5-year study period (2009–2013), the average number of farmers was 73,870 (males 67% and females 33%) with a total of 23,004 compensated occupational injuries (males 75% and females 25%). Claims most frequently involved work tasks related to animal husbandry. Altogether 319 usable responses were received to the postal survey (12.9% response rate). Farm work time and occupational injuries differed by gender. In general, crop production, construction work, forestry work, and few other farm work tasks including repair and maintenance of machines, and farmstead and road maintenance were male-dominated, whereas females took the main responsibility for domestic work and caretaking work. Animal husbandry was divided more evenly between males and females with their relative work contributions of 56% and 44%, respectively. Animal husbandry-related injuries were divided correspondingly between the genders (males 57% and females 43%) but all other types of injuries occurred mostly to males.

Conclusions While many studies have shown that male farmers have a much greater risk of injury than females, our study shows that given equal work time, the risk of injury was also equal. Therefore, rather than a risk factor, gender is an indicator of different work exposures in farming. This finding suggests that targeting interventions to males is still appropriate, but it is more important to target the underlying hazardous work tasks and exposures as they increase the injury risk of both males and females.

  • Agriculture
  • exposure
  • farmer
  • insurance

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.