Statistics from Altmetric.com
On 29 November 2002, five firemen attending a minor collision on the side of a bridge on highway A7, near the town of Loriol in south-eastern France, were hit by a car driven by an 81-year-old man. Three firemen died immediately and two others were thrown over the bridge into the river.1 The investigation concluded that the driver was physically and mentally healthy and that he admitted he was driving at over 150 km (90 miles) per hour.2 However, some members of the media suggested that the collision could have been avoided if systematic assessment of fitness to drive was mandatory for all older people.3 As a result, the French Ministry of Health asked the Academy of Medicine to set up a taskforce to define medical contra-indications to driving, and procedures for screening patients with specific conditions.4 The taskforce mostly consisted of clinical and occupational medicine physicians (see the appendix in the report by Dômont5). Although criteria for the relevance of screening6 and the usefulness of such programmes had previously been questioned,7 the process seemed to lack the public health perspective expected when a screening programme was being considered. In this Policy Forum, we assess, using criteria for assessing screening for driving fitness in older persons, whether the evidence shows that major guidelines for physicians result in improved road safety, and whether their potential benefits actually outweigh the disadvantages for the elderly and those with specific conditions, especially in terms of loss of mobility and its consequences.
Assessing the usefulness of early detection
All screening programmes are based on a single hypothesis8: the early detection of disease with potentially severe consequences improves prognosis by facilitating timely treatment. Screening can only be effective, however, if: (1) the preclinical phase is long; (2) treatment is more effective early than late; …
Funding This work was funded through the salaries of the authors provided by their institutions.
Contributors LRS contributed substantially to designing the study and analysing the data, and drafted the article; SL contributed substantially to designing the study and to acquiring, analysing and interpreting the data, and critically revised the article for important intellectual content; CH and EL contributed substantially to analysing and interpreting the data, and critically revised the article for important intellectual content; all authors gave final approval of the version submitted.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
This paper is based on a presentation given by LRS at the Transportation Research Board Conference ‘Emerging issues in safe and sustainable mobility for older people’, Washington, DC, 30 August to 1 September 2011.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.