Objective To identify independent factors associated with caregiver supervision levels at beaches.
Methods Children (aged 1–14 years) engaged in beach play and their caregivers were observed at Australian beaches during September–April, 2008/09. Caregiver, child, and environmental factor data were collected and recorded on a validated observation instrument. The main outcome of interest was a continuous measure of supervision. After adjusting for potential clustering by beach/state, multivariable linear regression was used to identify independent factors associated with caregiver supervision.
Results Four independent predictors of supervision and one interaction effect (child age by the caregiver and child position on beach) were identified. Caregivers who were supervising from a different position to where the child was playing were less likely to provide high supervision, as were older caregivers (>35 years) compared to younger caregivers (≤34 years). Compared to children playing alone, children playing with one, or two or more others were less likely to receive high supervision, and children aged 1–4 years were likely to receive higher supervision than older children.
Conclusion This study provides new knowledge about underlying factors associated with the level of caregiver supervision in beach settings. Future studies should continue to explore independent predictors of supervision so that effective programmes, which focus on caregiver supervision, can be targeted to address poor supervision practices.
- Child supervision
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding LAP was funded by an NHMRC Public Health Postgraduate Research Scholarship. CFF was funded by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of Ballarat Human Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.