Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter in reply to John Langley’s
  1. E Krug1,
  2. I Arias2
  1. 1
    Department for Violence and Injury Prevention and Disability, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  2. 2
    National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  1. Dr Etienne Krug, Av Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; kruge{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

John Langley raises an important point. Terminology is important, and there may be some lack of clarity in the terminology used currently. However, the current terminology is the result of experience and deliberate thinking of many in the field of injury prevention and control over the past few years. There are several reasons for using the term violence instead of intentional injuries.

First and foremost, the absence of the word violence in “injury prevention and control” is an obstacle in communications with a wide range of stakeholders. When violence is not …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None.