Systematic evidence reviews support the efficacy of physical activity programs and multifactorial strategies for fall prevention. However, community settings in which fall prevention programs occur often differ substantially from the research settings in which efficacy was first demonstrated. Because of these differences, alternative approaches are needed to judge the adequacy of fall prevention activities occurring as part of standard medical care or community efforts. This paper uses the World Health Organization Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC) framework to rethink how fall prevention programs might be implemented routinely in both medical and community settings. Examples of innovative programs and policies that provide fall prevention strategies consistent with the ICCC framework are highlighted, and evidence where available is provided on the effects of these strategies on processes and outcomes of care. Finally, a “no wrong door” approach to fall prevention and management is proposed, in which older adults who are found to be at risk of falls in either a medical or community setting are linked to a standard fall risk evaluation across three domains (physical activity, medical risks, and home safety).
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health or the National Academy of Sciences.
Funding: DG is supported by the UCLA Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute on Aging (5P30AG028748). GA is supported by the VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D Center of Excellence for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (Postdoctoral Fellowship No TPP 65-007) and Fall Prevention Center of Excellence funded by the Archstone Foundation. SW is supported by the Roybal Center for Health Policy Simulation funded by the National Institute on Aging (5P30 AG024968-02).
Competing interests: None.