Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study

S J Thornley; A Woodward; J D Langley; S N Ameratunga; A Rodgers

doi:10.1136/ip.2007.016675

Responses

PDF

Original Article

Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study

Free

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Side flag
Tom Trottier
Published on: 13 May 2016
Cycling in New Zealand
Peter J Morgan
Published on: 13 May 2016
Re: High-conspicuity aids and motorists' perception of cyclists' motion and distance
Tom Trottier
Published on: 13 May 2016
High-conspicuity aids and motorists' perception of cyclists' motion and distance
Tony H. Reinhardt-Rutland
Published on: 13 May 2016

Published on: 13 May 2016
Side flag
- Tom Trottier
- Other Contributors:
  Tom Trottier
Dear Editor
One strategy to increase the bubble around you is to put a side flag on your passing side. Drivers then give you more room. EG, see http://www.bikecommuters.com/2007/08/18/d-tour-bicycle-safety-flag-first- impression/
Tom

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 13 May 2016
Cycling in New Zealand
- Peter J Morgan, General Practitioner
Dear Editor
My wife and I spent a couple of months cycling in the South Island last year. Apart from some cycling-friendly towns (eg Nelson, Wanaka) it was in general a terrifying and oppressive experience. Even on relatively quiet roads, overtaking traffic would often scrape past us in spite of our obvious visibility and bulk (because of our loads) and relative instability. Following traffic unable to overtake w...
Show More

Dear Editor
My wife and I spent a couple of months cycling in the South Island last year. Apart from some cycling-friendly towns (eg Nelson, Wanaka) it was in general a terrifying and oppressive experience. Even on relatively quiet roads, overtaking traffic would often scrape past us in spite of our obvious visibility and bulk (because of our loads) and relative instability. Following traffic unable to overtake would loom along very close behind. And not infrequently we had the alarming experience of an oncoming overtaking driver coming straight at us leaving us nowhere to go. What a pity as we found the other aspects of NZ and its people to be warm and welcoming. There was a TV campaign when we were there named, I think, "imagine the bubble" whereby drivers are meant to imagine a cyclist to be surrounded by a bubble thus ensuring a safer overtake but few drivers seemed to have taken any notice. My point is that blame in crashes often is put on to the victim rather than the perpetrator, tables 3 and 4 indicate a reduction in accidents wearing high visibility clothing but there remains a very significant residue in the hi-vis group who did nevertheless have accidents. The solution must be either to have proper separation of cyclists and traffic or to ensure a much safer driving population maybe by strong legal sanction.
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 13 May 2016
Re: High-conspicuity aids and motorists' perception of cyclists' motion and distance
- Tom Trottier
- Other Contributors:
  Tom Trottier
Dear Editor
The original study considered fluorescent clothing which stands out with bright unusual colours. The background matters less, so long as it does not consist of other bright unusual colours. It would be interesting if the original data considered where the fluorescent cyclists had collisions. I expect that they were more at risk along commercial streets than residential ones because of the many commerc...
Show More

Dear Editor
The original study considered fluorescent clothing which stands out with bright unusual colours. The background matters less, so long as it does not consist of other bright unusual colours. It would be interesting if the original data considered where the fluorescent cyclists had collisions. I expect that they were more at risk along commercial streets than residential ones because of the many commercial signs with bright unusual colours, against which their clothing was more like camouflage than sore thumb.
In many jurisdictions, motorcycles and cars are required to have lights on day or night. It would be useful to have a study of whether bright lights would increase the ability of drivers to notice cyclists day or night. I would theorize that flashing lights would increase the visibility of lone cyclists, while continuous lights would be easier to comprehend if there are many cyclists.
Daytime lights have become more practical in recent years with the development of cheap and efficient LED lights, which do not need heavy batteries or a draggy generator to produce bright light.
Tom Trottier
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 13 May 2016
High-conspicuity aids and motorists' perception of cyclists' motion and distance
- Tony H. Reinhardt-Rutland, Reader in Psychology
Dear Editor
As Thornley et al [1] indicate, the use of high-conspicuity aids by cyclists must be beneficial: motorists can only avoid collision with the cyclist if they can detect the cyclist.
Unfortunately, high-conspicuity aids are not likely to affect the visibility of the roadway environment around the cyclist, so motorists' perceptions of the cyclist's motion and distance will remain poor in condi...
Show More

Dear Editor
As Thornley et al [1] indicate, the use of high-conspicuity aids by cyclists must be beneficial: motorists can only avoid collision with the cyclist if they can detect the cyclist.
Unfortunately, high-conspicuity aids are not likely to affect the visibility of the roadway environment around the cyclist, so motorists' perceptions of the cyclist's motion and distance will remain poor in conditions of night, fog and precipitation. Laboratory evidence shows unequivocally that perception of motion requires that the moving object be viewed against a visible background of other objects; without a visible background, the threshold for detecting the object's motion is extremely high [2].
One of the major cues for distance - motion parallax - is also dependent on a visible background. Motion parallax refers to movement of the retinal images of viewed objects as a result of the observer's movement; for example, viewing a distant point entails rates of retinal image motion inversely proportional to the distance of each of the objects from the observer. However, motion parallax is ineffective for perceiving an isolated object's distance [3]. Hence, the cyclist - for example, performing manoeuvres to left or right at a road junction - must be viewed against a visible roadway environment for motion parallax to be effective [4].
The argument presented here is underscored by the clear effectiveness of street-lighting in the reduction of pedestrian collisions with motor vehicles [5] - the pedestrian AND the roadway environment are made more conspicuous. This outcome must extend to cyclists.
The conclusion must be that the value of high-conspicuity aids should not be overstated: fundamental aspects of the motorist's perception must remain weak.
References
1. Thornley SJ, Woodward A, Langley JD, Ameratunga SN, Rodgers A. Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study. Inj Prev 2008;14:11-18.
2. Reinhardt-Rutland AH. Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview. Psychol Bull 1988;103:57-72.
3. Reinhardt-Rutland AH. Motion parallax. In Craighead WE, Nemeroff CB (eds.). Encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science (pp 977-979). New York: Wiley.
4. Reinhardt-Rutland AH. Some implications of motion-perception evidence and theory for road accidents. J Int Assoc of Traffic and Safety Sci 1992;16:9-14
5. Retting RA, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT. A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 1456-1463
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top

Main menu

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password